Seismic response of the monopile-bucket hybrid foundation in offshore sand deposit through centrifuge modeling

被引：0
|
作者：
Yang W. [1 ]
Zhang Z. [2 ]
Liang F. [2 ]
Wang Y. [2 ]
Tian H. [3 ]
机构：
[1] China Three Gorges Corporation, Wuhan
[2] Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of China Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai
[3] Shanghai Investigation, Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai
来源：
Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology | 2024年 / 56卷 / 02期
关键词：
centrifuge shaking table; monopile-bucket hybrid foundation; sand deposit; seismic response;
D O I：
10.11918/202209087
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Seismic action tends to result in the liquefication failure of offshore fan foundation in the sand deposit. Monopile-bucket hybrid foundation is a novel type of offshore fan foundation, combining the advantages of monopile and suction bucket foundations. To investigate the seismic response of this hybrid foundation in sand, a series of centrifugal shaking table model tests of monopile and the hybrid foundations in dry and saturated sand were conducted. White noise and seismic waves with different frequency spectrum components were used to stimulate the vibration for obtaining the natural vibration frequency, excess pore pressure accumulation of foundation soil, acceleration response of the offshore wind system and foundation bending moment distribution of the two foundation forms in sandy soil. The results show that the excess pore pressure of soil in saturated soil decreases in shallow depth under the bucket component of the hybrid foundation, while the acceleration amplitude is enlarged correspondingly. The shallow bending moment response of the monopile in saturated site is relatively larger with the turbine exhibiting obvious residual displacement. Compared with the monopile, the hybrid foundation shows greater acceleration response and smaller horizontal displacement in tests. The study provides a fresh reference for the seismic design of offshore wind structures with monopile and monopile-bucket hybrid foundations. © 2024 Harbin Institute of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：95 / 104
页数：9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] HAERI S, KAVAND A, RAHMANI I, Et al., Response of a group of piles to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading by large scale shake table testing, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 38, (2012)
  • [2] ZHANG Xinlei, WANG Zhihua, XU Zhenwei, Et al., Haking table model tests on dynamic response of pile groups under liquefaction-induced large ground displacement, Engineering Mechanics, 33, 5, (2016)
  • [3] BOULANGER R, KUTTER B, CURRAS C, Et al., Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses [ J ], Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125, 9, (1999)
  • [4] ABDOUN T, DOBRY R, O 'ROURKE T, Et al., Pile response to lateral spreads: centrifuge modeling[ J], Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129, 10, (2003)
  • [5] ABDOUN T, DOBRY R, ZERVA A., Evaluation of pile foundation response to lateral spreading [ J ], Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22, (2002)
  • [6] BRANDENBERG S, BOULANGER R, KUTTER B, Et al., Behavior of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131, 11, (2005)
  • [7] LIANG Fayun, CHEN Haibing, HUANG Maosong, Et al., Model test on seismic response of superstructure and pile group, Journal of Building Structures, 37, 9, (2016)
  • [8] ZHENG Xiangyun, LI Hongbin, RONG Weidong, Et al., Joint earthquake and wave action on the monopile wind turbine foundation: an experimental study [ J ], Marine Structures, 44, (2015)
  • [9] ZHU Bin, XIONG Gen, LIU Jinchao, Et al., Centrifuge modelling of a large-diameter single pile under lateral loads in sand, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 35, 10, (2013)
  • [10] DING Hongyan, HU Caiqing, ZHANG Puyang, Et al., Analysis of horizontal bearing capacity performance of pile-bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines in single-layer clay, The Ocean Engineering, 32, 2, (2014)
123