Comprehensive evaluation method for construction scheme of C4ISR system

被引：0
|
作者：
Jiao Z.-Q. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang J.-Y. [1 ]
Yao P.-Y. [1 ]
Wang X. [3 ]
Zeng H.-J. [4 ]
机构：
[1] College of Information and Navigation, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an
[2] Unit 95910, Jiuquan
[3] College of Information and Communication, National University of Defense Technology, Xi’an
[4] Unit 95806, Beijing
来源：
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2022年 / 37卷 / 12期
关键词：
C4ISR system; comparative advantage relationship; evaluation benchmark; group decision; Kendall concordance coefficient;
D O I：
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2021.0660
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The construction scheme evaluation method of the C4ISR system are studied in this paper. Based on the analysis of the constuction process of the C4ISR system, the index system architecture is designed. The Kendall concordance coefficient test method and the weight calculation method based on distance optimization are combined to integrate the expert opinions more objectively. The evaluation method of comparative advantage relationship is improved by introducing the evaluation benchmark, which avoids the data normalization process and reduces the repeated calculation of the evaluated scheme in the incremental evaluation. The algorithm can be effectively applied to the incremental evaluation process and can also reduce the evaluation time cost when the number of schemes is large. Experimental analysis verifies the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. © 2022 Northeast University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：3297 / 3306
页数：9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Cao L, Bao G Y, Chen G Y., C4ISR system, pp. 268-286, (2012)
  • [2] Xia X T, Xu Y Z, Jin Y P, Et al., Assessment of optimum confidence interval of reliability with three-parameter Weibull distribution using bootstrap weighted-norm method, Journal of Aerospace Power, 28, 3, pp. 481-488, (2013)
  • [3] Yin M., Study on risk management for civil aircraft flight test instrumentation project, (2017)
  • [4] Hapsari M A, Subiyanto S., Fuzzy AHP based optimal design building-attached photovoltaic system for academic campus, International Journal of Photoenergy, 2020, (2020)
  • [5] Vavrek R., Evaluation of the impact of selected weighting methods on the results of the TOPSIS technique, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 18, 6, pp. 1821-1843, (2019)
  • [6] Liu Y B, Zhang W F, Wang X M., Multi-attribute fuzzy trust access control scheme for cloud manufacturing system, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 24, 2, pp. 321-330, (2018)
  • [7] Sun Y, Yao P Y, Zhang J Y., Measurement and comprehensive evaluation of C2 organizational information structure efficiency, Systems Engineering and Electronics, 37, 6, pp. 1313-1318, (2015)
  • [8] Zhang J Y, He Y C, Sun Y, Et al., Method for assessing the importance level of influencing factors of network information system-of-systems linkage, Systems Engineering and Electronics, 41, 10, pp. 2287-2292, (2019)
  • [9] Qi X G., Research on evaluation method of technology contribution to weapon equipment system, (2015)
  • [10] Wu X H, Wang J Q, Peng J J, Et al., A novel group decision-making method with probability hesitant interval neutrosophic set and its application in middle-level manager selection, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 8, 4, pp. 291-319, (2018)
123