A Survey of Reliability Modeling and Evaluation Methods for Active Distribution Cyber-physics Systems

被引：0

作者：

Guo J. ^{[1
]}

Liu W. ^{[1
]}

Zhang J. ^{[1
]}

Ma T. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System With Renewable Energy Sources (North China Electric Power University), Changping District, Beijing

来源：

Dianwang Jishu/Power System Technology | 2019年 / 43卷 / 07期

关键词：

Cyber physical distribution system; Cyber physical interaction; Reliability evaluation; Reliability modeling;

D O I：

10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2019.0073

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Deep fusion of cyber physics is an important technical feature of active distribution systems (ADS), and also makes ADS a typical cyber-physical distribution system (CPDS). This paper mainly reviews the research status of CPDS reliability modeling and evaluation methods. Firstly, factors bringing new challenges to CPDS reliability evaluation, such as complex cyber failure factors and unclear mechanism of cyber-physical interaction, are pointed out. Then, around various aspects of CPDS reliability evaluation process, existing work is reviewed and summarized from four aspects: element modeling, interaction analysis, evaluation indices and evaluation algorithms, and the limitations of existing researches are summarized. On this basis, several issues that need to be studied in future CPDS reliability assessment are expected: research on unified cyber-physical modeling methods, refined element reliability modeling, analysis method suitable for CPDS cyber-physical interaction, new CPDS reliability evaluation index system and accurate and efficient algorithm design. The direction for subsequent related research is also pointed out. © 2019, Power System Technology Press. All right reserved.

引用

页码：2403 / 2412

页数：9

共 57 条

[1] CIGRE TB 591. Planning and optimization methods for active distribution systems
[2] Lee I., Sha L., Stankovic J., Cyber-physical systems: the next computing revolution, Design Automation Conference, (2010)
[3] Ma Z., Zhou X., Shang Y., Et al., Form and development trend of feature distribution system, Proceedings of the CSEE, 35, 6, pp. 1289-1298, (2015)
[4] Buldyrev S.V., Parshani R., Paul G., Et al., Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks, Nature, 464, 7291, pp. 1025-1028, (2010)
[5] Vaiman M., Bell K., Chen Y., Et al., Risk assessment of cascading outages: methodologies and challenges, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27, 2, pp. 631-641, (2012)
[6] Zimmerman R., Decision-making and the vulnerability of interdependent critical infrastructure, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, (2004)
[7] Liu W., Gong Q., Guo J., Et al., Reliability simulation of ADN cyber-physical system based on hybrid communication network, Proceedings of the CSEE, 36, 6, pp. 1706-1718, (2018)
[8] Deng L., Liu Y., Yu Y., Et al., Reliability assessment of distribution network information physical system considering the whole process of fault processing, Electric Power Automation Equipment, 37, 12, pp. 22-29, (2017)
[9] Bessani M., Fanucchi R.Z., Delbem A.C.C., Et al., Impact of operators'performance in the reliability of cyber-physical power distribution systems, IET Generation Transmission & Distribution, 10, 11, pp. 2640-2646, (2016)
[10] Guo J., Han Y., Guo C., Et al., Reliability assessment of cyber phtsical power system considering monitoring function and control function, Proceedings of the CSEE, 36, 8, pp. 2123-2130, (2016)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →