GPS/BDS/Galileo precise orbit determination using triple-frequency uncombined observation model

被引:0
|
作者
Zeng T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sui L. [2 ]
Ruan R. [3 ,4 ]
Jia X. [3 ,4 ]
Xiao G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Troops 93216, Beijing
[2] Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou
[3] State Key Laboratory of Geo-Information Engineering, Xi'an
[4] Xi'an Research Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Xi'an
关键词
Ambiguity resolution; GNSS; Precise orbit determination; Triple-frequency; Uncombined model;
D O I
10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20200159
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The navigation satellite of the four global navigation satellite system (GNSS) transmitting multi-frequency signals becomes a prevailing trend. In this contribution, a triple-frequency (TF) uncombined (UC) precise orbit determination (POD) method based on IGS clock datum is developed and its ambiguity resolution strategy is proposed. The hardware delay of carrier phase is divided by time-invariant and variant components. Then the UC observation model is given by re-parameterizing the unknown parameters. The step-by-step ambiguity fixing method, i.e. the extra-wide-lane, wide-lane and narrow-lane ambiguities fixed in sequence, is deduced by using double-differenced ambiguities in a network. With the GPS IIF, BDS-2 and Galileo being able to transmit triple-frequency signals, the four POD tests are conducted: ionospheric-free (IF) POD of frequency 1/2, IF POD of frequency 1/3, UC POD of frequency 1/2, UC POD of TF signals. The three metrics of external orbit product, day boundary discontinuities and satellite laser ranging are used to validate the POD product accuracy. Results show that a subtle improvement are received with the addition of the third frequency observations. However, the improvement of GPS TF POD results with respect to L1/L2 POD is about 10%, which may be the signal power of L5 is stronger than that of L2. © 2021, Surveying and Mapping Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 180
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] LI Xingxing, GE Maorong, ZHANG Hongping, Et al., A method for improving uncalibrated phase delay estimation and ambiguity-fixing in real-time precise point positioning, Journal of Geodesy, 87, 5, pp. 405-416, (2013)
  • [2] TU Rui, GE Maorong, ZHANG Hongping, Et al., The realization and convergence analysis of combined PPP based on raw observation, Advances in Space Research, 52, 1, pp. 211-221, (2013)
  • [3] GUO Fei, ZHANG Xiaohong, WANG Jinling, Et al., Modeling and assessment of triple-frequency BDS precise point positioning, Journal of Geodesy, 90, 11, pp. 1223-1235, (2016)
  • [4] ZHANG Xiaohong, LIU Gen, GUO Fei, Et al., Model comparison and performance analysis of triple-frequency BDS precise point positioning, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 43, 12, pp. 2124-2130, (2018)
  • [5] ZHANG Baocheng, OU Jikun, YUAN Yunbin, Et al., Precise point positioning algorithm based on original dual-frequency GPS code and carrier-phase observations and its application, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 39, 5, pp. 478-483, (2010)
  • [6] GU Shengfeng, Research on the zero-difference un-combined data processing model for multi-frequency GNSS and its applications, (2013)
  • [7] SCHONEMANN E., Analysis of GNSS raw observations in PPP solutions, (2014)
  • [8] GU Shengfeng, SHI Chuang, LOU Yidong, Et al., Ionospheric effects in uncalibrated phase delay estimation and ambiguity-fixed PPP based on raw observable model, Journal of Geodesy, 89, 5, pp. 447-457, (2015)
  • [9] LIU Teng, ZHANG Baocheng, YUAN Yunbin, Et al., Multi-GNSS triple-frequency differential code bias (DCB) determination with precise point positioning (PPP), Journal of Geodesy, 93, 5, pp. 765-784, (2019)
  • [10] YANG Xinhao, GU Shengfeng, GONG Xiaopeng, Et al., Regional BDS satellite clock estimation with triple-frequency ambiguity resolution based on undifferenced observation, GPS Solutions, 23, 2, (2019)