Dynamic load characteristics of an airport runway bridge during aircraft landing based on co-simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Xianfeng M. [1 ,2 ]
Xingyan H. [3 ]
Hui J. [3 ]
Songhua W. [1 ,2 ]
Tiezhi C. [1 ,2 ]
Meng L. [3 ]
Yongxue S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Airport Planning and Design Institute Co. Ltd., Beijing
[2] Civil Aviation Airport Engineering Technology Research Center, Beijing
[3] School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing
来源
关键词
aircraft landing and taxiing simulation; aircraft-bridge coupling model; co-simulation; dynamic factor; dynamic load characteristic; runway bridge;
D O I
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2024.02.012
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to study the influence of impact action on the dynamic responses of the airport bridge during aircraft landing and taxiing. Taking a runway bridge for the aircraft of class C as the research object and the Boeing 737-800 aircraft as an example, the technology of co-simulation based on a finite element software and a multi-body dynamics software was applied to the establishment of an aircraft-bridge coupling model. The whole process of aircraft landing and taxiing on the bridge with different landing attitudes was simulated finely. Based on verifying the accuracy of the aircraft-bridge coupling model, the influence degree and rule of the landing mass, sinking speed, pitch angle and roll angle on the bridge dynamic responses were systematically discussed and the distribution range of the bridge dynamic factor was defined. The results show that the dynamic factor of bridge is mainly between 1. 26 and 1. 62 under the impact action of aircraft landing. The dynamic factor of bridge increases with the increase of the landing mass, sinking speed and roll angle while decreases with the increase of the grounding speed and pitch angle. The sinking speed has the most obvious influence. When the sinking speed increases from 1. 00 m/s to 3. 05 m/s, the dynamic factor increases from 0. 98 to 1.87, an increase of 90%. The effect of dynamic load during aircraft landing and taxiing needs to be considered reasonably in the design of the runway bridge. © 2024 Chinese Vibration Engineering Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] SUN Rongmei, ZHANG Xianmin, Dynamic response analysis of a sliding lane bridge under moving aircraft load [ J ], Journal of Shijiazhuang Railway Institute (Natural Science), 21, 4, pp. 57-62, (2008)
  • [2] MOULDS B A., Design considerations for aircraft bridges, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 6, 6, pp. 498-505, (2001)
  • [3] QI C X, GAO Y H, AN Q Z., Research on the effect of width-span ratio on the bridge impact coefficient, Applied Mechanics and Materials, pp. 1670-1673, (2013)
  • [4] LUO Kunsheng, ZHAO Yuetang, CHEN Yunhe, Et al., Numerical simulation analysis of aircraft landing process on prestressed bridge, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 29, 1, pp. 188-192, (2010)
  • [5] REIS A J, MELO F G., Runway and taxiway on bridge of Macau international airport, Structural Engineering International, 2, 2, pp. 137-139, (2018)
  • [6] GUO Chen, CUI Sheng' ai, ZENG Huijiao, Et al., Joint simulation of vehicle-bridge system with aerodynamic characteristics affected by various wave bottom surfaces [ J ], Journal of Vibration and Shock, 40, 23, pp. 260-268, (2021)
  • [7] CUI Sheng' ai, SHAN Deshan, ZHU Bing, Simulation of vehicle bridge coupling vibration for Yujiang river bridge on Nanning-Guangzhou high-speed railway [ J ], Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 46, 3, pp. 385-390, (2011)
  • [8] NAEIMI M, TATARI M, ESMAEILZADEH A, Et al., Dynamic interaction of the monorail-bridge system using a combined finite element multibody-based model, Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics, 229, 2, pp. 132-151, (2014)
  • [9] NAEIMI M, TATARI M., Dynamics of the monorail train subjected to the braking on a straight guideway bridge, Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 62, 3, pp. 363-376, (2015)
  • [10] STEFAN D, GERHARD H, GUNTER S., Interaction of vehicles and flexible tracks by co-simulation of multibody vehicle systems and finite element track models, Vehicle System Dynamic, 37, pp. 372-384, (2002)