Semi-physical simulation system for hovering control with multi-mode hybrid propulsion

被引:0
|
作者
Ren J. [1 ]
Zhang D. [1 ]
Xia H. [1 ]
Zeng Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
关键词
Drip-drop hovering; Multi-mode electric propulsion; Relative kinematics; Semi-physical simula-tion system;
D O I
10.13695/j.cnki.12-1222/o3.2019.04.019
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As the complexity of space missions increases, the design of the ground verification system of relative motion control becomes increasingly difficult, especially for geostationary satellites, whose relative motion configuration involves various flight forms such as accompanying flight, circling flight, and hovering, etc. Aiming at the new requirement of hovering control of geostationary orbit satellites, the formation of the "drip" hovering configuration in the plane is studied by using the parameters of semi-long axis difference and eccentricity difference based on relative orbital parameters description method. A two-parameter design method of in-plane hovering in multi-mode hybrid propulsion mode is proposed, and a general space motion simulation verification system is designed with the positional accuracy being in the order of millimeter. Semi-physical tests for the configuration guidance control law are carried out, which show that the semi-physical simulation posi-tion estimation error is about 20 m (3σ), the guidance control law is correct, and the proposed verification method can also be applied to the ground of other relative motion control techniques. © 2019, Editorial Department of Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 545
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Gaias G., D'Amico S., Impulsive maneuvers for formation reconfiguration using relative orbital elements, Journal of Guidance Control & Dynamics, 38, 6, pp. 1036-1049, (2014)
  • [2] Sun Y., Zhao W., Li C., Et al., Hovering control for space-craft in relative orbit based on fixed-time stabilization theory, Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 48, 4, pp. 26-31, (2016)
  • [3] Huang X., Yan Y., Huang Z., Finite-time control of under-actuated spacecraft hovering, Control Engineering Practice, 68, pp. 46-62, (2017)
  • [4] Rao Y., Han C., Yin J., Et al., Method of spacecraft hovering formation design and control, Acta Aeronau-Tica et Astronautica Sinica, 36, 7, pp. 2361-2371, (2015)
  • [5] Subramanian G.P., Foust R., Chen D., Et al., Information-driven systems engineering study of a formation flying demonstration mission using Six CubeSats, 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (2015)
  • [6] Rao Y., Yin J., Han C., Hovering formation design and control based on relative orbit elements, Journal of Guidance Control & Dynamics, 152, 2, pp. 1-12, (2015)
  • [7] Zhang R., Yin J., Han C., Spacecraft forced fly-around formation design and control, Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 43, 10, pp. 2030-2039, (2017)
  • [8] Wei B., Sun X., Wang X., The review of all-electric pro-pulsion platform on satellite, Vacuum and Cryogenics, 22, 5, pp. 301-305, (2016)
  • [9] Liu C.M., Juang J.C., Orbit transfer from earth to mars using modified Lambert algorithm, Proceedings of 2016 International Automatic Control Conference, pp. 155-160, (2016)
  • [10] He S., Zhu Z., Peng C., Et al., Optimal design of near-Earth asteroid sample-return trajectories in the Sun-Earth-Moon system, Acta Mechanica Sinica, 32, 4, pp. 753-770, (2016)