Intercalibration of FY-3B/MWRI and GCOM-W1/AMSR-2 brightness temperature over the Arctic

被引:0
|
作者
Tang X. [1 ]
Chen H. [1 ]
Guan L. [1 ,2 ]
Li L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Marine Technology, College of information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao
[2] Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao
来源
关键词
AMSR-2; Arctic area; Brightness temperature; FY-3; Intercalibration; MWRI; Remote sensing;
D O I
10.11834/jrs.20208436
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Microwave radiometers have been widely applied in polar region research because of their all-weather and all-time capabilities. Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI) on FY-3B is the microwave radiometer of China's own research and development and has aroused widespread concern. Long time series of earth observation data records play an important role in the research of earth environment changes and trends. The Arctic region is used as the study area and the data of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2 (AMSR-2) on Global Change Observation Mission 1st-Water (GCOM-W1) are considered the standard data in providing the intercalibration result and the basis of retrieving remote sensing parameters in Arctic region in the future. Ascending and descending brightness temperatures at 10 channels in 2015 from FY-3B/MWRI are calibrated against those from GCOM-W1/AMSR-2. Before brightness temperature data analysis and intercalibration, the data are processed in five steps. The first step is reading data, in which the DN value of remote sensing is transferred to brightness temperature value in the research region. The second step is data quality control. If the standard deviation of values in a grid and eight surrounding grids is more than 3 K, then the values in the nine grids should be eliminated. The value that is more than 300 K or less than 10 K should also be eliminated. In the third step, stereographic projection is used to project the brightness temperature value, time, longitude, and latitude into 896×608 grids. In the fourth step, data at the land-sea boundary and Marginal Ice Zone (MIZ) should be eliminated because of the mixed pixel. First, the grid data of 7×7 around the land data are marked as land, and the data marked as land are removed. Then, the ratio of V187 to V365 from AMSR-2 is used to calculate the MIZ. The ratio, which is equal to 0.92, is viewed as the threshold to divide the sea ice and the open water. Thereafter, the 3×3 grid is set as a template. If the template includes the grids that represent sea ice and open water, then the nine grids are eliminated. The fifth and last step is to set the time window as 30 min and the space window as 12.5 km ×12.5 km and convert 2D matched data to 1D data for intercalibration. The intercalibration results of MWRI and AMSR-2 are as follows. First, the brightness temperature data of each channel of MWRI are smaller than those of AMSR-2, and the absolute values of monthly bias of vertical polarization channels are greater than those of horizontal polarization channels at the same frequency. The difference in monthly bias between ascending and descending orbits is small in each channel, which is less than 1 K. Second, the difference in the monthly bias in each channel between the ascending and descending orbits in the sea ice area is less than 1 K, while that in the open water is between 0 and 1.5 K. Third, linear regression analysis shows that most of the correlation coefficients of MWRI and AMSR-2 in each channel are above 0.99, which indicates a good correlation. The slope and intercept of the intercalibration of each channel in the ascending and descending orbits are obtained. Fourth, the brightness temperature of MWRI after calibration is consistent with that of AMSR-2. This consistency indicates that the intercalibration is effective. © 2020, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1032 / 1044
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Chander G, Hewison T J, Fox N, Wu X Q, Xiong X X, Blackwell W J., Overview of intercalibration of satellite instruments, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51, 3, pp. 1056-1080, (2013)
  • [2] Chen J, Wu S L., Comparison analysis between MWRI and AMSR-E brightness temperature data over the polar region ice sheet, Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 29, 5, pp. 752-760, (2014)
  • [3] Du J Y, Kimball J, Shi J C, Jones L, Wu S L, Sun R J, Yang H., Inter-calibration of satellite passive microwave land observations from AMSR-E and AMSR2 using overlapping FY3B-MWRI sensor measurements, Remote Sensing, 6, 9, pp. 8594-8616, (2014)
  • [4] Hu T X, Zhao T J, Shi J C, Gu J Z., Inter-calibration of AMSR-E and AMSR2 brightness temperature, Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 31, 5, pp. 919-924, (2016)
  • [5] Huang D, Qiu Y B, Shi L J, Wu S L, Liu X S, Ruan Y J., Cross-calibration for passive microwave measurement of MWRI and AMSR-E, Science of Surveying and Mapping, 42, 1, pp. 136-142, (2017)
  • [6] Huang W, Hao Y L, Wang J, Cui T W., Brightness temperature data comparison and evaluation of FY-3B MicroWave radiation imager with AMSR-E, Periodical of Ocean University of China, 43, 11, pp. 99-111, (2013)
  • [7] Imaoka K, Kachi M, Kasahara M, Ito N, Nakagawa K, Oki T., Instrument performance and calibration Of AMSR-E and AMSR2, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, XXXVIII, (2010)
  • [8] Imaoka K, Maeda T, Kachi M, Kasahara M, Ito N, Nakagawa K., Status of AMSR2 instrument on GCOM-W1, Proceedings Volume 8528, Earth Observing Missions and Sensors: Development, Implementation, and Characterization II, (2012)
  • [9] Ji Q, Pang X P, Zhang Z P, Zhao X, Liu Q Q, Gao X., The changes of Antarctic sea ice and its surface snow depth, The 34th China Meteorological Annual Conference S3 Proceedings of the Icecaps on Global Climate Change Responses and Feedback, (2017)
  • [10] Liu G F, Wu S L, Chen W Y, Pan L, He J K., Calibration system and achievement of microwave radiation imager of FY-3 satellite, Journal of Microwaves, pp. 576-579, (2014)