Study on the potential instability patterns of tunnel type underground caverns for compressed air energy storage

被引:0
|
作者
Sun G. [1 ,2 ]
Yi Q. [1 ,2 ]
Yao Y. [3 ]
Shang H. [4 ]
Ji W. [4 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hubei, Wuhan
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
[3] Central Southern China Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd. of China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Hubei, Wuhan
[4] China Energy Digital Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing
关键词
high internal pressure tunnel; high-pressure compressed air energy storage(CAES); potential failure surface; stability; tunnelling engineering;
D O I
10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2023.0199
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the rapid development of new energy sources, the compressed air energy storage(CAES) underground caverns, which differ from traditional tunnel conditions, face stability issues in the overlying rock mass. The potential instability modes of these shallow-buried tunnel-type CAES caverns urgently need to be studied. Adopting the Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion and based on the ultimate stress field of the rock mass and considering both tensile and shear failure modes, the problem of potential instability modes in shallow buried high internal pressure tunnel-type lined rock caverns is reduced to the initial value problem of a cluster of ordinary differential equations, and the solution method is given. The reliability of the method is verified by comparing and analyzing the results with the physical model test results. In addition, the effects of burial depth, tunnel diameter, in-situ stress ratio and internal friction angle on the instability pattern are investigated, and the results show that the in-situ stress ratio and internal friction angle have a significant influence. The horizontal stress direction is perpendicular to the axis of the tunnel, which is more conducive to the stability of the overlying rock. On the other hand, the influence of the internal friction angle on the instability pattern depends on the in-situ stress ratio. When the in-situ stress ratio is less than 1, the smaller the internal friction angle is, the closer the potential rupture surface is to the horizontal;when the in-situ stress ratio is equal to 1, the internal friction angle has almost no effect;when the in-situ stress ratio is greater than 1, the larger the internal friction angle is, the closer the potential rupture surface is to the horizontal. In view of this, the design of cavern layout, burial depth and diameter should consider both in-situ stress and internal friction angle. Finally, potential failure surface morphology is parameterized in a simple geometric way, and the correspondence between the geometric parameters and the in-situ stress ratio and internal friction angle is given for engineering reference. In terms of failure modes, when the geostress coefficient is small, the potential failure surface exhibits a tensile-shear composite mode, with the tension region located near the cavern wall and the ground surface. When the geostress coefficient is large, the failure mode is primarily shear. © 2024 Academia Sinica. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] LI Zhongkui, MA Fangping, LIU Hui, Underground engineering problems in compressed air energy storage and its developing future, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 22, pp. 2121-2126, (2003)
  • [2] XU Xinqiao, YANG Chunhe, LI Yinping, Review on compressed air energy storage abroad and its feasibility application to Hubei province, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 25, pp. 3987-3992, (2006)
  • [3] PERAZZELLI P, ANAGNOSTOU G., Design issues for compressed air energy storage in sealed underground cavities[J], Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 8, 3, pp. 314-328, (2016)
  • [4] CAI Xiaohong, CAI Yongping, Stress calculation of hydraulic pressure tunnel, pp. 40-48, (2004)
  • [5] KIM H M, PARK D, RYU D W, Et al., Parametric sensitivity analysis of ground uplift above pressurized underground rock caverns[J], Engineering Geology, 135, 136, pp. 60-65, (2012)
  • [6] PERAZZELLI P, ANAGNOSTOU G, AMBERG J., Uplift analysis for CAES tunnels, The 14th International Conference of the International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, pp. 1691-1696, (2014)
  • [7] BRANDSHAUG T, CHRISTIANSON M, DAMJANAC B., Technical review of the lined rock caverns (LRC) concept and design methodology:mechanical response of rock mass, (2001)
  • [8] TUNSAKUL J, JONGPRADIST P, SOPARAT P, Et al., Analysis of fracture propagation in a rock mass surrounding a tunnel under high internal pressure by the element-free Galerkin method[J], Computers and Geotechnics, 55, pp. 78-90, (2014)
  • [9] XU Yingjun, XIA Caichu, ZHOU Shuwei, Et al., Anti-uplift failure criterion of caverns for compressed air energy storage based on the upper bound theorem of limit analysis, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 41, 10, pp. 1971-1980, (2022)
  • [10] LITTLEJOHN G S, BRUCE D A., Rock anchors-state of the art, Part 1:design (1), Ground Engineering, 8, 3, pp. 25-32, (1975)