Hierarchical Dimensionless Method Based on Data Distribution Characteristics and Its Equilibrium Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Yi P.-T. [1 ]
Yuan J.-R. [1 ]
Li W.-W. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang
关键词
data density; dimensionless method; hierarchical dimensionless method; objective hierarchy; outlier;
D O I
10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2023.06.017
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The hierarchical dimensionless method can effectively remove the effect of different index dimensions, and solve imbalanced data distribution and low discrimination caused by anomalous index values. However, when using this method, it is necessary to artificially specify the number of partition intervals so that the dimensionless results are interfered by human factors and lose objectivity. To solve this problem, a dimensionless method of density hierarchy is proposed considering the distribution characteristics of raw data. This method divides the interval according to the density of data distribution, objectively determines the hierarchical series, and takes into account the advantages of the hierarchical dimensionless method. The calculation is comparatively simple and reduces human factors. In addition, through the stochastic simulation method, it is found that the method has good anti-interference to outliers, and the balance of dimensionless results is affected by the scale of raw data. © 2023 Northeastern University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 897
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Chen Y, Li W W, Yi P T., Evaluation of city innovation capability using the TOPSIS-based order relation method: the case of Liaoning Province,China, Technology in Society, 63, (2020)
  • [2] Dong Q K, Yi P T, Li W W, Et al., Evaluation of city sustainability using the HGRW method: a case study of urban agglomeration on the West Side of the Straits, China [ J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, (2022)
  • [3] Chao X R, Kou G, Peng Y, Et al., Large-scale group decision-making with non-cooperative behaviors and heterogeneous preferences: an application in financial inclusion [ J ], European Journal of Operational Research, 288, 1, pp. 271-293, (2021)
  • [4] Carli R, Dotoli M, Pellegrino R., Multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable metropolitan cities assessment [ J], Journal of Environmental Management, 226, pp. 46-61, (2018)
  • [5] Zhang Z G, Hu X, Liu Z T, Et al., Multi-attribute decision making: an innovative method based on the dynamic credibility of experts [ J ], Applied Mathematics and Computation, 393, (2021)
  • [6] Li W W, Yi P T, Li L Y., Superiority-comparison-based transformation, consensus, and ranking methods for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision-making [ J ], Expert Systems with Applications, 213, (2023)
  • [7] Liu Y T, Sun Z W, Liang H M, Et al., Ranking range model in multiple attribute decision making: a comparison of selected methods, Computers &Industrial Engineering, 155, (2021)
  • [8] Mohammadi M, Rezaei J., Ensemble ranking: aggregation of rankings produced by different multi-criteria decision-making methods, Omega, 96, (2020)
  • [9] Guo Ya-jun, Yi Ping-tao, Character analysis of linear dimensionless methods [ J], Statistical Research, 25, 2, pp. 93-100, (2008)
  • [10] Yi Ping-tao, Zhang Dan-ning, Guo Ya-jun, Et al., Study on dimensionless methods in dynamic comprehensive evaluation [ J], Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 30, 6, pp. 889-892, (2009)