Ground motion intensity measures and dynamic response indexes of metro station structures

被引:0
|
作者
Zhong Z.-L. [1 ]
Shen Y.-Y. [1 ]
Zhen L.-B. [1 ]
Zhang C.-M. [1 ]
Zhao M. [1 ]
Du X.-L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing
关键词
Efficiency; Ground motion; Intensity measure; Nonlinear dynamic analysis; Seismic response index;
D O I
10.11779/CJGE202003010
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are many kinds of ground motion intensity measures that affect the dynamic response of metro stations. It is of great practical significance to study the correlation between the ground motion intensity measures and the structural seismic response indexes for seismic design of underground structures. In order to study the ground motion intensity measures suitable for evaluating subway underground stations under the near-field ground motion, the Daikai metro station is taken as the prototype. Based on the results of nonlinear time-history analysis, through the bilinear logarithmic regression analysis of 22 seismic intensity measures and structural seismic response indexes, the ground motion intensity measures and structural seismic response indexes are analyzed and evaluated in terms of efficiency, practicality and proficiency. The results show that the acceleration ground motion intensity measure represented by PGA and the spectral correlation ground motion intensity measure represented by ASI are more suitable for studying one-story subway station structures, which are suitable for predicting the dynamic response of structures under ground motion. The drift ratio between the top slab and the bottom slab, the shear force at the bottom of the middle column and the bending moment at the bottom of the middle column are suitable as the dynamic response indexes for predicting the underground subway structures. © 2020, Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 494
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Riddell R., On ground motion intensity indices, Earthquake Spectra, 23, 1, pp. 147-173, (2007)
  • [2] Padgett J.E., Desroches R., Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 8, pp. 1157-1174, (2008)
  • [3] Ye L.-P., Ma Q.-L., Miao Z.-W., Study on earthquake intensities for seismic analysis of structures, Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 29, 4, pp. 9-22, (2009)
  • [4] Kong X.-J., Pang R., Zou D.-G., Et al., Seismic performance evaluation of high CFRD based on incremental dynamic analysis, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 40, 6, pp. 978-984, (2018)
  • [5] Parra-Montesinos G.J., Bobet A., Ramirez J.A., Evaluation of soil-structure interaction and structural collapse in Daikai subway station during Kobe earthquake, ACI Materials Journal, 103, 1, pp. 113-122, (2006)
  • [6] Code for Seismic Design of Urban Rail Transit Structures: GB50909-2014, (2014)
  • [7] Zhao P.-F., Study on the Zoing of Ground Motion Parameters and its Application, (2018)
  • [8] Huan Y., Fang Q., Chen L., Et al., 3D Nonlinear damage analysis of metro-station structures under strong seismic loading, Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 6, pp. 852-862, (2011)
  • [9] Xu Z.G., Du X.L., Xu C.S., Et al., Numerical research on seismic response characteristics of shallow buried rectangular underground structure, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, pp. 242-252, (2019)
  • [10] Zhuang Z.-J., Numerical Simulation and Laboratory Research of Liquefiable Soils Deformation During the Earthquake, (2008)