Pricing decision making in logistics service supply chain considering corporate social responsibility

被引：0
|
作者：
Tan C. [1 ,2 ]
Li B. [2 ]
Zhou L. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Information, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing
[2] School of Business, Central South University, Changsha
来源：
Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS | 2021年 / 27卷 / 08期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Corporate social responsibility; Logistics service supply chain; Power structures; Pricing decision;
D O I：
10.13196/j.cims.2021.08.027
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Aiming at a Logistic Service Supply Chain (LSSC) consisted a Logistics Service Integrator (LSI) and a Functional Logistics Service Provider (FLSP), based on different power structures and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), the pricing decision was investigated, the optimal selection of subject of CSR in different power structures was discussed, and the most suitable LSSC in the same subject of CSR was studied. The results indicated that the follower investment was more beneficial to market demand and the whole supply chain performance and could achieve win-win between LSI and FLSP by comparing to leader investment. Under the situation of pricing and service decision, LSI and FLSP tended to assume CSR by each other party. Among the different power structures, the market demand and supply chain performance were the lowest with FLSP dominance. CSR had the positive effect on the market demand and utility. © 2021, Editorial Department of CIMS. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：2461 / 2475
页数：14
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] BAUMGARTNERR J., Managing corporate sustainability and CSR:A conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development[J], Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21, 5, pp. 258-271, (2014)
  • [2] MAAS S, RENIERS G., Development of a CSR model for practice:Connecting five inherent areas of sustainable business[J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 2, pp. 104-114, (2014)
  • [3] Coopers Waterhouse, CSR trends 2010:Stacking up the results
  • [4] VOGEL D J., Is there a market for virtue?The business case for corporate social responsibility[J], California Management Review, 47, 4, pp. 19-45, (2005)
  • [5] FOMBRUN C J, GARDBERG N A, BARNETT M L., Opportunity platforms and safety nets:Corporate citizenship and Reputational Risk[J], Business and Society Review, 105, 1, pp. 85-106, (2000)
  • [6] ELTANTAWY R A, FOX G L, GIUNIPERO L., Supply management ethical responsibility:Reputation and performance impacts[J], Supply Chain Management:An International Journal, 14, 2, pp. 99-108, (2009)
  • [7] SEN S, BHATTACHARYA C B., Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility, Journal of marketing Research, 38, 2, pp. 225-243, (2001)
  • [8] MA Peng, SHANG J, WANG Haiyan, Enhancing corporate social responsibility:Contract design under information asymmetry, Omega, 67, pp. 19-30, (2017)
  • [9] CHEN Yu, China's corporate social responsibility level is in its infancy
  • [10] Daily Laodong, Companies share corporate social responsibility
1234