Study on source parameters of the 8 August 2017 M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its aftershocks, northern Sichuan

被引:0
|
作者
Wu W.-W. [1 ]
Wei Y.-L. [1 ]
Long F. [1 ]
Liang M.-J. [1 ]
Chen X.-F. [1 ]
Sun W. [1 ]
Zhao J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Earthquake Agency, Chengdu
来源
Dizhen Dizhi | 2020年 / 42卷 / 02期
关键词
Focal mechanism; Jiuzhaigou earthquake; Relocation; Seismogenic structure; Stress drop;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2020.02.015
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
On August 8, 2017, a strong earthquake of M7.0 occurred in Jiuzhaigou County, Aba Prefecture, northern Sichuan. The earthquake occurred on a branch fault at the southern end of the eastern section of the East Kunlun fault zone. In the northwest of the aftershock area is the Maqu-Maqin seismic gap, which is in a locking state under high stress. Destructive earthquakes are frequent along the southeast direction of the aftershocks area. In Songpan-Pingwu area, only 50~80km away from the Jiuzhaigou earthquake, two M7.2 earthquakes and one M6.7 earthquake occurred from August 16 to 23, 1976. Therefore, the Jiuzhaigou earthquake was an earthquake that occurred at the transition part between the historical earthquake fracture gap and the neotectonic active area. Compared with other M7.0 earthquakes, there are few moderate-strong aftershocks following this Jiuzhaigou earthquake, and the maximum magnitude of aftershocks is much smaller than the main shock. There is no surface rupture zone discovered corresponding to the M7.0 earthquake. In order to understand the feature of source structure and the tectonic environment of the source region, we calculate the parameters of the initial earthquake catalogue by Loc3D based on the digital waveform data recorded by Sichuan seismic network and seismic phase data collected by the China Earthquake Networks Center. Smaller events in the sequence are relocated using double-difference algorithm; source mechanism solutions and centroid depths of 29 earthquakes with ML≥3.4 are obtained by CAP method. Moreover, the source spectrum of 186 earthquakes with 2.0≤ML≤5.5 is restored and the spatial distribution of source stress drop along faults is obtained. According to the relocations and focal mechanism results, the Jiuzhaigou M7.0 earthquake is a high-angle left-lateral strike-slip event. The earthquake sequence mainly extends along the NW-SE direction, with the dominant focal depth of 4~18km. There are few shallow earthquakes and few earthquakes with depth greater than 20km. The relocation results show that the distribution of aftershocks is bounded by the M7.0 main shock, which shows obvious segmental characteristics in space, and the aftershock area is divided into NW segment and SE segment. The NW segment is about 16km long and 12km wide, with scattered and less earthquakes, the dominant focal depth is 4~12km, the source stress drop is large, and the type of focal mechanism is complicated. The SE segment is about 20km long and 8km wide, with concentrated earthquakes, the dominant depth is 4~12km, most moderate-strong earthquakes occurred in the depth between 11~14km. Aftershock activity extends eastward from the start point of the M7.0 main earthquake. The middle-late-stage aftershocks are released intensively on this segment, most of them are strike-slip earthquakes. The stress drop of the aftershock sequence gradually decreases with time. Principal stress axis distribution also shows segmentation characteristics. On the NW segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 91.39°, the average elevation angle is about 20.80°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NE-SW, and the average elevation angle is about 58.44°. On the SE segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 103.66°, the average elevation angle is about 19.03°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NNE-SSW, and the average elevation angle is about 15.44°. According to the fault profile inferred from the focal mechanism solution, the main controlling structure in the source area is in NW-SE direction, which may be a concealed fault or the north extension of Huya Fault. The northwest end of the fault is limited to the horsetail structure at the east end of the East Kunlun Fault, and the SE extension requires clear seismic geological evidence. The dip angle of the NW segment of the seismogenic fault is about 65°, which may be a reverse fault striking NNW and dipping NE. According to the basic characteristics of inverse fault ruptures, the rupture often extends short along the strike, the rupture length is often disproportionate to the magnitude of the earthquake, and it is not easy to form a rupture zone on the surface. The dip angle of the SE segment of the seismogenic fault is about 82°, which may be a strike-slip fault that strikes NW and dips SW. The fault plane solution shows significant change on the north and south sides of the main earthquake, and turns gradually from compressional thrust to strike-slip movement, with a certain degree of rotation. © 2020, Editorial Office of Seismology and Geology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 512
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] CHENG Jia, YAO Sheng-hai, LIU Jie, Et al., Viscoelastic Coulomb stress of historical earthquakes on the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and the subsequent influence on the seismic hazards of adjacent faults, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61, 5, pp. 2133-2151, (2018)
  • [2] DENG Qi-dong, GAO Xiang, CHEN Gui-hua, Et al., Recent tectonic activity of Bayankala fault-block and the Kunlun-Wenchuan earthquake series of the Tibetan plateau, Earth Science Frontiers, 17, 5, pp. 163-178, (2010)
  • [3] FANG Li-hua, WU Jian-ping, SU Jin-rong, Et al., Relocation of mainshock and aftershock sequence of the M<sub>S</sub>7.0 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou earthquake, Chinese Science Bulletin, 63, 7, pp. 649-662, (2018)
  • [4] FANG Li-hua, WU Jian-ping, WANG Wei-lai, Et al., Relocation of the mainshock and aftershock sequences of M<sub>S</sub>7.0 Sichuan Lushan earthquake, Chinese Science Bulletin, 58, 20, pp. 1901-1909, (2013)
  • [5] GAO Xiang, DENG Qi-dong, Activity analysis of large earthquakes in boundary faults around the Bayankala faulting block, Acta Geologica Sinica, 87, 1, pp. 9-19, (2013)
  • [6] HOU Kang-ming, WEN Xue-ze, Earthquake rupture characteristics of intraplate reverse fault and signs of fault segmentation, Northwestern Seismological Journal, 21, 3, pp. 302-309, (1999)
  • [7] HUANG Yuan, WU Jian-ping, ZHANG Tian-zhong, Et al., Relocation of the M<sub>S</sub>8.0 Wenchuan earthquake and its aftershock sequence, Science in China(Ser D), 38, 10, pp. 1242-1249, (2008)
  • [8] LIN Xiang-dong, GE Hong-kui, XU Ping, Et al., Near field full waveform inversion: Lushan magnitude 7.0 earthquake and its aftershock moment tensor, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 56, 12, pp. 4037-4047, (2013)
  • [9] LU Ren-qi, XU Xi-wei, CHEN Li-chun, Et al., Seismotectonics of the 8 August 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and the three-dimensional fault models in the seismic region, Seismology and Geology, 40, 1, pp. 1-11, (2018)
  • [10] LUO Jiang, Regional geological survey report of the People's Republic of China, 1︰200<sup>0</sup>00: Zhangla Sheet, (1978)