CPTU-based probabilistic model and evaluation method for liquefaction of sandy and silty soils

被引:0
|
作者
Duan W. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Cai G. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhao Z. [2 ]
Liu S. [2 ]
Dong X. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan
[2] Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
[3] School of Civil Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei
[4] Anhui Institute of Intelligent Underground Detection Technology, Hefei
关键词
piezocone penetration test; pore pressure ratio; probability of liquefaction; sandy soil; silty soil;
D O I
10.11779/CJGE20210645
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The liquefaction of cohesionless soils is closely related to the pore water pressure. The in situ testing technology, piezocone penetration test (CPTU) which can directly measure the pore water pressure, has unique advantages in liquefaction evaluation. In this study, a CPTU-based model for assessing the probability of liquefaction is derived by a rigorous mathematical method. The new probabilistic model is expressed in the form of a mapping function that relates the liquefaction probability mathematically to the factor of safety obtained from the CPTU-based deterministic model, which is established by the kernel extreme learning machine algorithm and the robust search technology. The new probabilistic model considers the inherent model uncertainty and parameter uncertainty, and makes a comparative analysis of the probabilistic model. The results show that the factor of safety (FS) of 1 yields a probability of liquefaction (PL) of 15.2%. The obvious advantage of the new model is that it directly uses the CPTU data, which is more suitable for the phenomenon of liquefaction behavior, and is suitable for sandy soil and silty soil. The new model can be used for liquefaction evaluation or preliminary screening without the need of additional sampling and laboratory testing. Finally, a liquefaction case of Tangshan earthquake in China is used to illustrate the application of the proposed probabilistic model considering the uncertainties of model and parameters. © 2023 Chinese Society of Civil Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 74
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] SEED H B, IDRISS I M., Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 97, 9, pp. 1249-1273, (1971)
  • [2] YOUD T L, IDRISS I M., Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127, 4, pp. 297-313, (2001)
  • [3] YUAN Xiaoming, CAO Zhenzhong, Conventional soils parameters-based liquefaction probabilistic evaluation formula and its reliability analysis, China Civil Engineering Journal, 47, 4, pp. 99-108, (2014)
  • [4] CAI Guojun, LIU Songyu, TONG Liyuan, Et al., Evaluation of liquefaction of sandy soils based on cone penetration test, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 27, 5, pp. 1019-1027, (2008)
  • [5] ROBERTSON P K, WRIDE C F., Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35, 3, pp. 442-459, (1998)
  • [6] BOULANGER R W, IDRISS I M., CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142, 2, (2016)
  • [7] BRAY J D, SANCIO R B., Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132, 9, pp. 1165-1177, (2006)
  • [8] DUAN W, CONGRESS S S C, CAI G J, Et al., Empirical correlations of soil parameters based on piezocone penetration tests (CPTU) for Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge (HZMB) Project, Transportation Geotechnics, 30, (2021)
  • [9] KU C S, JUANG C H, CHANG C W, Et al., Probabilistic version of the Robertson and Wride method for liquefaction evaluation: development and application, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 49, 1, pp. 27-44, (2012)
  • [10] LIAO S S C, VENEZIANO D, WHITMAN R V., Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 114, 4, pp. 389-411, (1988)