A Hierarchical Double Penalty Method of Gray-Scale Elements for SIMP in Topology Optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Lian R. [1 ]
Jing S. [1 ]
He Z. [1 ]
Shi Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing
关键词
Intermediate density element; Penalty factor; Sensitivity filter; Topology optimization; Variable density approach;
D O I
10.3724/SP.J.1089.2020.18064
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the topology optimization for continuum structures, the sensitivity filtering methods can effectively eliminate the problem of numerical instability, but it is easy to cause the gray-scale diffusion phenomenon at the boundary of the final optimized structure. In order to obtain a crisp topological configuration, a hierarchical double penalty method of gray-scale elements for SIMP (solid isotropic microstructures with penalization) is proposed. The me-thod applies a penalty factor in the SIMP method without sensitivity filter to modify sensitivity of the element from the standard SIMP method, which accelerates the approximation of the intermediate density units to the discrete state of 0 or 1. To further speed up the process, the method is implemented in a hierarchical mesh subdivision strategy. Starting from a coarse finite element mesh and using the element density equivalent mapping method, the solution with the coarse mesh as a starting input for the same problem but with a refined mesh. By reducing the computational cost of the units in the optimization process, the convergence rate of the optimization process is improved while achieving the distinct topology structure. Different methods are used to solve the MBB beam problem. The number of intermediate density elements contained in the optimized structures obtained by different methods and their time consumption in the entire optimization process were compared, respectively. The mesh dependency of this method is verified by using cantilever beam examples under different mesh divisions. The results show that the SIMP algorithm combined with hierarchical double penalty obtains a topological configuration with clear boundaries and improves the convergence rate while retaining the stability of the original solution. © 2020, Beijing China Science Journal Publishing Co. Ltd. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1356and1227
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Suzuki K, Kikuchi N., A homogenization method for shape and topology optimization, Computer Mechanics and Engineering, 93, 3, pp. 291-318, (1991)
  • [2] Diaz A R, Bendsoe M P., Shape optimization of structures for multiple loading conditions using a homogenization method, Structural Optimization, 4, 1, pp. 17-22, (1992)
  • [3] Rietz A., Sufficiency of a finite exponent in SIMP (power law) methods, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 21, pp. 159-163, (2001)
  • [4] Querin O M, Steven G P, Xie Y M., Evolutionary structural optimization using an additive algorithm, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 34, 3, pp. 291-308, (2000)
  • [5] Querin O M, Young V, Steven G P, Et al., Computational efficiency and validation of bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 189, 2, pp. 559-573, (2000)
  • [6] Sui Yunkang, Yang Deqing, Wang Bei, Topology optimization of continuum structures under multi-case stress and displacement constraints, Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 32, 2, pp. 171-179, (2000)
  • [7] Sethian J A, Wiegmann A., Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods, Journal of Computational Physics, 163, 2, pp. 489-528, (2000)
  • [8] Wu Yifan, Zheng Bailin, He Lyuyang, Et al., Equivalent conversion method of gray-scale elements for SIMP in structures topology optimization, Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 29, 4, pp. 759-767, (2017)
  • [9] Bendsoe M P, Sigmund O., Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications, (2013)
  • [10] Sigmund O, Petersson J., Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on pro-cedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima, Structural Optimization, 16, 1, pp. 68-75, (1998)