Reciprocal velocity obstacle algorithm for collision risk avoidance of intelligent connected vehicles

被引:0
|
作者
Wang S.-C. [1 ]
Li Z.-B. [1 ]
Cao Q. [1 ]
Wang B.-T. [1 ]
Ding H.-L. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Transportation, Southeast University, Jiangsu, Nanjing
[2] Institute of Smart City and Intelligent Transportation, Southwest Jiaotong University, Sichuan, Chengdu
关键词
collision avoidance path planning algorithm; collision risk potential field; intelligent connected vehicle; model predictive control; reciprocal velocity obstacle algorithm; traffic control;
D O I
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.05.019
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A reciprocal velocity obstacle (RVO) algorithm for collision risk detection and collaborative path planning for collision avoidance of intelligent connected vehicles was constructed to address the dynamic collision avoidance in the collaborative driving among multiple intelligent vehicles. Based on the artificial potential field (APF) theory, a vehicle collision risk potential field (CRPF) was built to quantify both the collision risk intensity and risk area. According to the interactive effect of vehicle driving behavior, an RVO algorithm was constructed to determine the conditions and rules for collaborative collision risk avoidance among conflicting vehicles. Based on the vehicle dynamics constraints, a dynamic window approach was established to identify the feasible velocity solution set for collision risk avoidance. Based on the principle of model predictive control, the optimization theory was employed to build a path planning model for the vehicle collision risk avoidance. The effectiveness of the proposed collision risk avoidance algorithm was tested and compared with other collision avoidance algorithms by constructing the collision avoidance simulation scenarios for the single conflicting vehicle, multiple conflicting vehicles, and conflicting traffic flow in bottleneck areas under an intelligent connected environment. Research results show that compared to other comparative algorithms, the security performance and efficiency performance of the RVO algorithm improves by more than 8.6% and 9.6%, respectively, indicating that the proposed RVO algorithm can effectively reduce the collision avoidance velocity and trajectory fluctuations for conflicting vehicles via the collaborative collision avoidance behavior, effectively avoid the collision conflicts among vehicles with nonlinear speeds and trajectories and mitigates the multiple vehicle collisions and significant traffic flow fluctuations in bottleneck areas. The proposed collision avoidance algorithm outperforms other algorithms in bottleneck areas with large-scale vehicle conflicts, enhancing the vehicle traffic efficiency by 10.42% and reducing the vehicle collision risk by 47.32%. Thus, the algorithm has sound performance in coordinating the collision avoidance behavior of large-scale conflict vehicles and reducing the vehicle collision risks and operation delays. © 2023 Chang'an University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 282
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] GUO Yan-yong, LIU Pei, YUAN Quan, Et al., Review of research on road traffic safety of connected and automated vehicles, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, (2023)
  • [2] GUO Yan-yong, SAYED T, ZHENG Lai, A hierarchical Bayesian peak over threshold approach for conflict-based before-after safety evaluation of leading pedestrian intervals, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 147, (2020)
  • [3] GUO Yan-yong, LIU Pan, WU Yao, Et al., Design approach of channelized island based on traffic conflict models at signalized intersection, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 17, 4, pp. 140-148, (2017)
  • [4] YANG Min, WANG Li-chao, ZHANG Jian, Et al., Collaborative method of vehicle conflict resolution in merging area for intelligent expressway, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 20, 3, pp. 217-224, (2020)
  • [5] WANG Jian-qiang, ZHENG Xun-jia, HUANG He-ye, Decision-making mechanism of the drivers following the principle of least action, China Journal of Highway and Transport, 33, 4, pp. 155-168, (2020)
  • [6] ALBAKER B M, RAHIM N A., Unmanned aircraft collision detection and resolution: concept and survey, 20105th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 248-253, (2010)
  • [7] VELASCO M G A, BORST C, ELLERBROEK J, Et al., The use of intent information in conflict detection and resolution models based on dynamic velocity obstacles, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16, 4, pp. 2297-2302, (2015)
  • [8] FIORINI P, SHILLER Z., Motion planning in dynamic environments using velocity obstacles, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 17, 7, pp. 760-772, (1998)
  • [9] WILKIE D, VAN DEN BERG J, MANOCHA D., Generalized velocity obstacles, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5573-5578, (2009)
  • [10] SHENG Peng-cheng, ZENG Xiao-song, LUO Xin-wen, Et al., Multi-objective dynamic obstacle avoidance algorithm of intelligent electric vehicles based on Bayesian theory, China Journal of Highway and Transport, 32, 6, pp. 96-104, (2019)