State-of-the-art on self-centering energy dissipative braces

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou Y. [1 ]
Shen J. [1 ]
Xiao Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
关键词
Earthquake resilient structure; Energy dissipative brace; Hysteretic behavior; Self-centering; Uncertainty;
D O I
10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.C281
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Self-centering energy dissipative braces have good abilities of re-centering and energy dissipation, which can decrease the damage of the main structures by controlling the structural seismic response, eliminating the residual drifts after earthquakes and providing additional energy dissipative capacity for structures. Due to their superior seismic performance and convenient construction and installation, self-centering energy dissipative braces have become one of the research hotspots of earthquake resilient structures. On the basis of reviewing the research of self-centering damper devices, the concept and principle mechanism of the initial self-centering energy dissipative braces were described and the related experimental studies were summarized. The current research, which is focused on how to improve the performance of the initial self-centering energy dissipative braces, was summarized from three aspects: improving the axial elongation capacity, innovating energy dissipative devices and reducing the level of prestressing force. In addition, the existing problems of self-centering energy dissipative braces were proposed, such as insufficiency research on dynamic reliability and uncertainty, imperfect hysteretic performance and the limitation of re-centering materials. Finally, the future research trends of self-centering energy dissipative braces were pointed out. © 2021, Editorial Office of Journal of Building Structures. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] ZHOU Ying, WU Hao, GU Anqi, Earthquake engineering: from earthquake resistance, energy dissipation, and isolation to resilience, Engineering Mechanics, 36, 6, pp. 1-12, (2019)
  • [2] MCCORMICK J, ABURANO H, IKENAGA M, Et al., Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1-8, (2008)
  • [3] RUIZ-GARCiA J, MIRANDA E., Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35, 3, pp. 315-336, (2006)
  • [4] RUIZ-GARCiA J, MIRANDA E., Evaluation of residual drift demands in regular multi-storey frames for performance-based seismic assessment, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35, 13, pp. 1609-1629, (2006)
  • [5] LU Xilin, CHEN Yun, MAO Yuanjun, New concept of structural seismic design: earthquake resilient structures, Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 39, 7, pp. 941-948, (2011)
  • [6] LU Xilin, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Cong, Research progress on innovative earthquake-resilient structural systems, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 34, 4, pp. 130-139, (2014)
  • [7] PRIESTLEY M J N., Overview of PRESSS research program, PCI Journal, 36, 4, pp. 50-57, (1991)
  • [8] PRIESTLEY M J N, SRITHARAN S, CONLEY J R, Et al., Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building, PCI Journal, 44, 6, pp. 42-67, (1999)
  • [9] PRIESTLEY M J N., The PRESSS program: current status and proposed plans for phase Ⅲ, PCI Journal, 41, 2, pp. 22-40, (1996)
  • [10] PAMPANIN S, CHRISTOPOULOS C, PRIESTLEY M J N., Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations: part II: multi-degree of freedom systems, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7, 1, pp. 119-147, (2003)