Assessing the use of standardized groundwater index for quantifying groundwater drought over the conterminous US

被引:0
|
作者
Guo, Mengshen [1 ,2 ]
Yue, Weifeng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Tiejun [3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Nengzhan [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Lijun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing,100875, China
[2] Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing,100875, China
[3] Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, School of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Weijin Road 92, Tianjin,300072, China
[4] Tianjin Key Laboratory of Earth Critical Zone Science and Sustainable Development in Bohai Rim, Tianjin University, Weijin Road 92, Tianjin,300072, China
关键词
Groundwater;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Groundwater drought is a drought phenomenon caused by the decrease in groundwater level or groundwater storage under natural and anthropogenic disturbances (e.g., climate variability/change and groundwater abstraction). Due to the complexity of groundwater flow systems and the difficulty in obtaining direct observational data related to groundwater resources, it remains challenging to characterize groundwater drought quantitatively. To this end, standardized groundwater level index (SGI), which was modified from the standardized precipitation index (SPI), was used to quantify groundwater drought with the long-term groundwater level data (1981–2010) obtained from the Climate Response Network wells across the conterminous United States. The best fitting function of groundwater level distributions was lognormal which was selected from various distribution functions based on the Anderson-Darling (AD) test among 100 wells. Four monitoring wells located in Georgia, Massachusetts, Oklahoma and Washington were selected as the main research objects. The trend of change in groundwater level was divided into two categories: the wells in Georgia and Oklahoma showed an initial decrease followed by an increase while the wells in Massachusetts and Washington showed a continuous decline. Groundwater drought varied significantly in different areas due to the complexity of geographical location, agricultural irrigation, population and other natural environment and human activities. Start and end time of drought conditions and the severity of drought and flooding at different time scales in the same area also varied, therefore it is necessary to describe different groundwater droughts at a reasonable time scale. In this paper, the difference between SGI and SPI at different time scales was so obvious that the cross-correlation analysis was used to find the law of lag time. The cross-correlation coefficients increased with the increasing time scales, and the average correlation values between SPI and SGI of wells in Georgia, Massachusetts, Oklahoma and Washington were −0.568, −0.634, −0.667 and 0.496, respectively. With the time scale increased, the lag time in Georgia and Oklahoma also increased, but the lag time in Massachusetts and Washington region was almost unchanged, and there was almost no lag time in Massachusetts region. Through the study of the hydrogeological conditions such as vadose zone, lithology, soil and the influence of human activities, the hysteresis effect can be analysed, which can provide a new alternative to the conventional method and important information for future groundwater resource management. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the use of standardized groundwater index for quantifying groundwater drought over the conterminous US
    Guo, Mengshen
    Yue, Weifeng
    Wang, Tiejun
    Zheng, Nengzhan
    Wu, Lijun
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 598
  • [2] Evaluation of a model-based groundwater drought indicator in the conterminous US
    Li, Bailing
    Rodell, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 526 : 78 - 88
  • [3] Drought Detection of Regional Nonparametric Standardized Groundwater Index
    Hone-Jay Chu
    Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 3119 - 3134
  • [4] Drought Detection of Regional Nonparametric Standardized Groundwater Index
    Chu, Hone-Jay
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (09) : 3119 - 3134
  • [5] Multiscale evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index as a groundwater drought indicator
    Kumar, Rohini
    Musuuza, Jude L.
    Van Loon, Anne F.
    Teuling, Adriaan J.
    Barthel, Roland
    Ten Broek, Jurriaan
    Mai, Juliane
    Samaniego, Luis
    Attinger, Sabine
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (03) : 1117 - 1131
  • [7] Using Standardized Groundwater Index and Standardized Precipitation Index to Assess Drought Characteristics of the Kaoping River Basin, Taiwan
    Yeh, Hsin-Fu
    Chang, Chia-Fu
    WATER RESOURCES, 2019, 46 (05) : 670 - 678
  • [8] GRACE Groundwater Drought Index: Evaluation of California Central Valley groundwater drought
    Thomas, Brian F.
    Famiglietti, James S.
    Landerer, Felix W.
    Wiese, David N.
    Molotch, Noah P.
    Argus, Donald F.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 198 : 384 - 392
  • [9] Hydrological drought assessment using the standardized groundwater index and the standardized precipitation index in the Berg River Catchment, South Africa
    Mukhawana, Mxolisi B.
    Kanyerere, Thokozani
    Kahler, David
    Masilela, Ndumiso Siphosezwe
    Lalumbe, Lindelani
    Umunezero, Annah Aphia
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2024, 53
  • [10] Methodology for assessing the groundwater quality index
    Vasileva, Tanya
    SPISANIE NA B LGARSKOTO GEOLOGICHESKO DRUZHESTOV-REVIEW OF THE BULGARIAN GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 80 : 200 - 202