The classification-based consensus model with minimum violations in heterogeneous group decision making

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang H. [1 ]
Zhu W. [1 ]
Dong Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing
[2] Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Classification-based decision making; Consensus; Heterogeneous preference information; Information violation; Optimization model;
D O I
10.12011/SETP2021-1357
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper investigates the classification-based group decision making problem with heterogeneous preference information from a perspective of minimum information violations. Firstly, an approach for measuring information violations between alternatives classification and heterogeneous preference information, and a classification-based consensus measure method are proposed. Then, a classification-based consensus model with minimum information violations is developed to generate consensual alternative classifications under a heterogeneous preference context. Further, an interactive classification-based consensus reaching process with heterogeneous preference information is designed to guide decision makers to adjust their heterogeneous preference information. Moreover, the properties of proposed classification-based consensus reaching model are discussed. Finally, a numerical example is offered to demonstrate the application process of the proposal. © 2022, Editorial Board of Journal of Systems Engineering Society of China. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1378 / 1390
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Hochbaum D S, Levin A., Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision, Management Science, 52, 9, pp. 1394-1408, (2006)
  • [2] Chen X H, Zhao C C, Yang L., A group decision-making model based on interal-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application on social network, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 37, 7, pp. 1842-1852, (2017)
  • [3] He Y Y, Song X C, Wan J H, Et al., Flood disaster fuzzy clustering interative assessment model considering preference information of decision-makers, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 36, 10, pp. 2680-2688, (2016)
  • [4] Teng Y, He X S, Ni D B., Risk assessment of private equity investment project based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation: A case study on 3 private equity investment projects, Journal of UESTC (Social Sciences Edition), 19, 5, pp. 67-73, (2017)
  • [5] Xu X H, Hou Y Z., Research status and development trend of large group risk decision-making theory and method, Journal of UESTC (Social Sciences Edition), 23, 4, pp. 1-6, (2021)
  • [6] Xu X H, Xia Y., Conflict-oriented interval fuzzy multi-criteria group decision method and its application in investment decision-making, Journal of UESTC (Social Sciences Edition), 24, 3, pp. 24-30, (2021)
  • [7] Gu J F., On synthesizing opinions-How can we reach consensus, Journal of Systems Engineering, 16, 5, pp. 340-348, (2001)
  • [8] Yu G F, Li D F, Qiu J M, Et al., Multi-attribute group decision making method for preference conflicting with different kinds of information, Control and Decision, 31, 11, pp. 2013-2018, (2016)
  • [9] Gong Z W, Xu C, Chiclana F, Et al., Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on China's urban demolition negotiation, Group Decision and Negotiation, 26, 2, pp. 379-407, (2017)
  • [10] Cheng F X, Cheng D, Zhao Y P, Et al., Research on the low-carbon supplier selection approach based on the consensus decision making, Operations Research and Management Science, 21, 6, pp. 68-73, (2012)