LFKT: Deep Knowledge Tracing Model with Learning and Forgetting Behavior Merging

被引:0
|
作者
Li X.-G. [1 ]
Wei S.-Q. [1 ]
Zhang X. [1 ]
Du Y.-F. [1 ]
Yu G. [2 ]
机构
[1] College of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang
[2] School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang
来源
Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software | 2021年 / 32卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deep neural network; Forgetting behavior; Intelligent education; Knowledge tracing; Learning behavior;
D O I
10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006185
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The knowledge tracing task is designed to track changes of students' knowledge in real time based on their historical learning behaviors and to predict their future performance in learning. In the learning process, learning behaviors are intertwined with forgetting behaviors, and students' forgetting behaviors have a great impact on knowledge tracing. In order to accurately model the learning and forgetting behaviors in knowledge tracing, a deep knowledge tracing model LFKT (learning and forgetting behavior modeling for knowledge tracing) that combines learning and forgetting behaviors is proposed in this study. To model such two behaviors, the LFKT model takes into account four factors that affect knowledge forgetting, including the interval between students' repeated learning of knowledge points, the number of repeated learning of knowledge points, the interval between sequential learning, and the understanding degree of knowledge points. The model uses a deep neural network to predict knowledge status with indirect feedbacks on students' understanding of knowledge according to students' answers. With the experiments on the real datasets of online education, LFKT shows better performance of knowledge tracing and prediction in comparison with the traditional approaches. © Copyright 2021, Institute of Software, the Chinese Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 830
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Adamopoulos P., What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses, Proc. of the ICIS, pp. 1-21, (2013)
  • [2] Zhou Q, Mou C, Yang D., Research progress on Int'l Conf. on educational data mining: A survey, Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 26, 11, pp. 3026-3042, (2015)
  • [3] Zhu TY, Huang ZY, Chen EH, Liu Q, Wu RZ, Wu L, Su Y, Chen ZG, Hu GP., Cognitive diagnosis based personalized question recommendation, Chinese Journal of Computers, 40, 1, pp. 176-191, (2017)
  • [4] Rabiner L, Juang B., An introduction to hidden Markov models, IEEE ASSP Magazine, 3, 1, pp. 4-16, (1986)
  • [5] Corbett AT, Anderson JR., Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge, User Modeling and User- Adapted Interaction, 4, 4, pp. 253-278, (1995)
  • [6] Graves A, Mohamed A, Hinton G., Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks, Proc. of the IEEE Int'l Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 6645-6649, (2013)
  • [7] LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P., Gradient-Based learning applied to document recognition, Proc. of the IEEE, 86, 11, pp. 2278-2324, (1998)
  • [8] Piech C, Bassen J, Huang J, Ganguli S, Sahami M, Guibas L, Sohl-Dickstein J., Deep knowledge tracing, Proc. of the Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 505-513, (2015)
  • [9] Zhang JN, Shi XJ, King I, Yeung D., Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing, Proc. of the Int'l Conf. on World Wide Web, pp. 765-774, (2017)
  • [10] Sukhbaatar S, Weston J, Fergus R., End-to-End memory networks, Proc. of the Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2440-2448, (2015)