Shaking table test of geotechnical seismic isolation system based on glass bead-sand cushions

被引:0
|
作者
Jing L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yin Z. [1 ,2 ]
Sun H. [4 ]
Dong R. [1 ,2 ]
Xu K. [1 ,2 ]
Cheng X. [5 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, 150080, Heilongjiang
[2] Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, 150080, Heilongjiang
[3] Institute of Disaster Prevention, Langfang, 065201, Hebei
[4] Zhuhai Engineering Investigation Institute of Guangdong Province, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong
[5] School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, 330013, Jiangxi
关键词
Geotechnical seismic isolation; Glass bead-sand cushions; Laminated shear box; Masonry structure; Shaking table test; Soil mechanics;
D O I
10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.1138
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, a geotechnical seismic isolation system(GSI-GBSC) based on glass bead-sand cushions is proposed to protect structures against the destroying effects of earthquakes, which is to backfill the glass bead-sand cushion material between the structural foundation and the foundation soil for isolation. A large-scale shaking table model test which considers the field was carried out through the single-layer masonry structure model with and without isolation system. The scale ratio of the single-layer masonry structure model was 1/4. The north-south component of the El-Centro wave recorded in 1940 was selected as the input wave, and the peak input acceleration(PIA) was adjusted to 0.1 g, 0.2 g and 0.4 g respectively. The test results show that the isolation effect of GSI-GBSC system is not significant enough when the minor earthquake occurs but the isolation effect strengthens with enhancing the earthquake intensity. When PIA is 0.4 g, the GSI-GBSC system decreases the roof acceleration and the inter-story drift of the structure by 50% and 47.5%, respectively, which means the GSI-GBSC system can significantly reduce the earthquake response of the superstructure and achieve seismic isolation. © 2020, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1458 / 1467
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] MAKOTO O, TOMOSHI M, MASAYUKI K, Et al., Finite-element analysis of laminated rubber bearing of building frame under seismic excitation, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 44, 11, pp. 1881-1898, (2015)
  • [2] LU X L, WANG D, WANG S S., Investigation of the seismic response of high-rise buildings supported on tension-resistant elastomeric isolation bearings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 45, 13, pp. 2207-2228, (2016)
  • [3] ATHANASIOS A M, GEORGE S, GEORGE D M., Stochastic response of structures with hybrid base isolation systems, Engineering Structures, 172, pp. 629-643, (2018)
  • [4] IOANNIS V K, MICHAEL C C, ANDREW S W., Modeling strength degradation in lead-rubber bearings under earthquake shaking, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39, 13, pp. 1533-1549, (2010)
  • [5] CAO Wanlin, YE Wei, ZHANG Yushan, Et al., Experimental study on working performance of the base sliding isolated masonry structure with glass beads-graphite layer, Journal of Natural Disasters, 5, pp. 37-46, (2015)
  • [6] SHANG Shouping, YAO Fei, LIU Ke, Study of the structure of a new type of isolation layer and shaking table test, China Civil Engineering Journal, 44, 2, pp. 36-41, (2011)
  • [7] LI Yingmin, BU Changming, LIU Kai, Et al., Shaking table experiment on a simple energy dissipation masonry structure, Journal of Chongqing University, 36, 6, pp. 46-52, (2013)
  • [8] TSANG H H., Seismic isolation by rubber-soil mixtures for developing countries, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 2, pp. 283-303, (2008)
  • [9] TSANG H H, LO S H, XU X, Et al., Seismic isolation for low- to-medium-rise buildings using granulated rubber-soil mixtures: numerical study, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41, 14, pp. 2009-2024, (2012)
  • [10] TSANG H H, PITILAKISB K., Mechanism of geotechnical seismic isolation system: Analytical modeling, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 122, pp. 171-184, (2019)