Dynamic risk assessment of huge caisson foundation construction based on set pair analysis theory

被引：0
|
作者：
Shi Z. [1 ]
Ji F. [1 ]
Yu W. [1 ]
Li B. [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
[2] Construction Headquarters of Nanjing Railway Terminal Project, China Railway Shanghai Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing
来源：
Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition) | 2021年 / 51卷 / 03期
关键词：
Caisson foundation; Contact number; Dynamic risk assessment; Monitoring data; Set pair analysis;
D O I：
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.03.009
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
To study the dynamic risk assessment of large caisson foundation in large bridges during construction, a risk assessment index system was proposed by combining risk assessment with construction monitoring. A dynamic risk assessment model was established with the five-element connection main number based on the theory of set pair analysis and the index weight determined by the analytic hierarchy process method. Taking the caisson foundation of the Wufengshan Yangtze River Bridge as an example, a dynamic risk assessment was carried out. The results show that, for the secondary dynamic risk indexes, the concrete stress index decreases to -0.47 at the 102nd working day, reflecting that the stress of the caisson concrete is complex and the risk of cracking is high. The settlement coefficient index and the height difference of four-corner index after 102 d are low, exhibiting the risk of small-scale stagnant sinking and sudden sinking. For the first-level indexes, low values of the structural stress index and the control parameter index reflect the fact of the complex stress of concrete and the extra-high risk level. The overall index fluctuates significantly after 90 working days with the lowest value of -0.09, showing the middle risk status of the caisson during sinking. © 2021, Editorial Department of Journal of Southeast University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：419 / 425
页数：6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Abdrabbo F, Gaaver K., Challenges and uncertainties relating to open caissons, DFI Journal-the Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute, 6, 1, pp. 21-32, (2012)
  • [2] Liu M Y, Chen K, Jing W., Principal component analysis method of construction risk of open caisson foundation in a bridge, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering), 39, 1, pp. 1-4, (2015)
  • [3] Deng Y S, Xiong H, Liu R, Et al., Research on construction displacement of north anchorage caisson of parrot cay Yangtze River bridges in Wuhan, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 34, S1, pp. 241-246, (2013)
  • [4] Peng Y P, Tu M, Cheng Y., The numerical simulation of position implantation and construction process of super large caisson, Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 12, 5, pp. 1179-1184, (2015)
  • [5] Cao R J., Dynamic simulation and safety performance evaluation of the construction process of the anchorage caisson foundation, (2017)
  • [6] Rafiq M I, Chryssanthopoulos M K, Sathananthan S., Bridge condition modelling and prediction using dynamic Bayesian belief networks, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11, 1, pp. 38-50, (2015)
  • [7] Mortazavi S, Kheyroddin A, Naderpour H., Risk evaluation and prioritization in bridge construction projects using system dynamics approach, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 25, 3, (2020)
  • [8] Abdollahzadeh G, Rastgoo S., Risk assessment in bridge construction projects using fault tree and event tree analysis methods based on fuzzy logic, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 1, 3, (2015)
  • [9] Salim W S W, Liew M S, Shafie A., Qualitative fault tree and event tree model of bridge defect for reinforced concrete highway bridge, 2014 InCIEC, pp. 639-650, (2014)
  • [10] Chen T T, Wang C H., Fall risk assessment of bridge construction using Bayesian network transferring from fault tree analysis, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23, 2, pp. 273-282, (2017)
12