The effectiveness of physical activity interventions on blood pressure in children and adolescents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Hassan, Mohamed A. [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Wanjiang [1 ]
Ye, Mingyi [3 ]
He, Hui [3 ]
Gao, Zan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota Twin Cities, Sch Kinesiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Helwan Univ, Phys Educ Coll Men, Dept Methods & Curriculum, Cairo 12552, Egypt
[3] Beijing Sport Univ, China Inst Sport & Hlth Sci, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Tennessee, Dept Kinesiol Recreat & Sport Studies, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Children; Diastolic blood pressure; Physical activity; Systolic blood pressure; SCHOOL-BASED INTERVENTION; DISEASE RISK-FACTORS; CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH; OBESITY PREVENTION; ACTIVITY PROGRAM; EXERCISE; HYPERTENSION; CHILDHOOD; 10-YEAR-OLD; OVERWEIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jshs.2024.01.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: High blood pressure (BP) is a major contributor to mortality and cardiovascular diseases. Despite the known benefits of exercise for reducing BP, it is crucial to identify the most effective physical activity (PA) intervention. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate the available evidence on the effectiveness of various PA interventions for reducing BP and to determine their hierarchy based on their impact on BP. Methods: A search of PubMed, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Eric databases was conducted up to December 2022 for this systematic review and NMA. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies targeting healthy children and adolescents aged 6-12 years old were included in this study. Only studies that compared controlled and intervention groups using PA or exercise as the major influence were included. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three independent investigators performed the literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. We used Bayesian arm-based NMA to synthesize the data. The primary outcomes were systolic BP and diastolic BP. We calculated the mean differences (MDs) in systolic BP and diastolic BP before and after treatment. Mean treatment differences were estimated using NMA and random-effect models. Results: We synthesized 27 studies involving 15,220 children and adolescents. PA combined with nutrition and behavior change was the most effective intervention for reducing both systolic BP and diastolic BP (MD = -8.64, 95% credible interval (95%CI):-11.44 to -5.84; MD = -6.75, 95%CI: -10.44 to -3.11), followed by interventions with multiple components (MD = -1.39, 95%CI: -1.94 to -0.84; MD = -2.54, 95%CI: -4.89 to -0.29). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that PA interventions incorporating nutrition and behavior change, followed by interventions with multiple components, are most effective for reducing both systolic BP and diastolic BP in children and adolescents.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 708
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effectiveness of physical activity interventions on blood pressure in children and adolescents:A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Mohamed AHassan
    Wanjiang Zhou
    Mingyi Ye
    Hui He
    Zan Gao
    Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2024, 13 (05) : 699 - 708
  • [2] Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sequi-Dominguez, Irene
    Cavero-Redondo, Ivan
    Alvarez-Bueno, Celia
    Lopez-Gil, Jose Francisco
    Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente
    Pascual-Morena, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [3] Physical Activity Interventions and Depression in Children and Adolescents A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Brown, Helen Elizabeth
    Pearson, Natalie
    Braithwaite, Rock E.
    Brown, Wendy J.
    Biddle, Stuart J. H.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 43 (03) : 195 - 206
  • [4] Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Midtiby, Stig L.
    Wedderkopp, Niels
    Larsen, Rasmus T.
    Carlsen, Anne-Marie Fiala
    Mavridis, Dimitris
    Shrier, Ian
    CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES, 2018, 26
  • [5] Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Stig L. Midtiby
    Niels Wedderkopp
    Rasmus T. Larsen
    Anne-Marie Fiala Carlsen
    Dimitris Mavridis
    Ian Shrier
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 26
  • [6] Comparative effectiveness of physical exercise interventions on sociability and communication in children and adolescents with autism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Kou, Ruijie
    Li, Zixuan
    Li, Ming
    Zhou, Rui
    Zhu, Feilong
    Ruan, Weiqi
    Zhang, Jia
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [7] The Effectiveness of Wearable Devices as Physical Activity Interventions for Preventing and Treating Obesity in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wang, Wentao
    Cheng, Jing
    Song, Weijun
    Shen, Yi
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2022, 10 (04):
  • [8] Effect of physical activity interventions on aggressive behaviors for children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ouyang, Na
    Liu, Jianghong
    AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2023, 69
  • [9] Physical Activity Interventions to Alleviate Depressive Symptoms in Children and Adolescents A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Recchia, Francesco
    Bernal, Joshua D. K.
    Fong, Daniel Y.
    Wong, Stephen H. S.
    Chung, Pak-Kwong
    Chan, Derwin K. C.
    Capio, Catherine M.
    Yu, Clare C. W.
    Wong, Sam W. S.
    Sit, Cindy H. P.
    Chen, Ya-Jun
    Thompson, Walter R.
    Siu, Parco M.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2023, 177 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [10] A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase physical activity in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities
    McGarty, A. M.
    Downs, S. J.
    Melville, C. A.
    Harris, L.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (04) : 312 - 329