The impact of multilingualism and socio-economic status on academic performance: evidence from the SCAMP and the national pupil databases

被引:1
|
作者
Filippi, Roberto [1 ,2 ]
Ceccolini, Andrea [2 ]
Perry, Roisin C. [1 ,3 ]
Thomas, Michael S. C. [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Educ, London, England
[2] UCL, Inst Educ, Multilanguage & Cognit Lab, London, England
[3] Birkbeck Coll, Ctr Brain & Cognit Dev, Dept Psychol Sci, London, England
关键词
Bilingualism; multilingualism; working memory; executive functions; cognitive development; bilingual advantage; education; LANGUAGE; CHILDREN; BILINGUALISM; AUTISM;
D O I
10.1080/13670050.2024.2397445
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of multilingualism and socioeconomic status on academic performance within the UK, utilising data from 3,213 pupils from the National Pupil Database who also took part in the Study of Cognition, Adolescents and Mobile Phones (SCAMP). We employed multilevel modelling to analyse the relationship between language experience, socioeconomic status and Key-Stage 2 (KS2 similar to 11 years) and Key-Stage 4 (KS4 similar to 16 years) performance in English, Mathematics and Science. Findings reveal that multilingual learners initially face academic challenges at KS2, particularly in English and Science, but achieve comparable results with monolingual peers by KS4, overcoming early setbacks. Notably, simultaneous multilinguals not only catch up but excel beyond their monolingual counterparts by KS4, demonstrating the significant long-term academic benefits of early multilingual exposure and /or its associated cultural factors. Further analysis indicates that multilingual group membership mitigated the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status, with pupils from these backgrounds making substantial academic strides between KS2 and KS4 compared to monolingual peers. This challenges prevalent misconceptions about multilingualism in education. These findings underscore the need for educational policies that harness linguistic diversity to foster academic equity and success, emphasising the crucial role of language experience and socioeconomic factors in shaping educational outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 72
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A PRACTICAL MEANS OF DETERMINING PUPIL SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS
    SMITH, HA
    PENNY, LL
    PEABODY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 1959, 36 (04): : 204 - 213
  • [2] Does the impact of smoking differ by socio-economic status? Evidence from Belgium
    Charafeddine, R.
    Van Oyen, H.
    Demarest, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 20 : 276 - 276
  • [3] SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS AND HEALTH: EVIDENCE FROM THE ECHP
    Cantarero, David
    Pascual, Marta
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2005, 9
  • [4] Socio-economic status and academic performance in higher education: A systematic review
    Rodriguez-Hernandez, Carlos Felipe
    Cascallar, Eduardo
    Kyndt, Eva
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2020, 29
  • [5] Impact of socio-economic status on health
    Kulkarni, Mrinmoyi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 432 - 432
  • [6] Memory performance and socio-economic status
    Herrmann, D
    Guadagno, MA
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 11 (02) : 113 - 120
  • [7] Socio-economic status and prevention of cardiovascular disease in Italy: evidence from a national health survey
    Damiani, Gianfranco
    Federico, Bruno
    Bianchi, Caterina B. N. A.
    Ronconi, Alessandra
    Basso, Danila
    Fiorenza, Sonia
    Sassi, Franco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 21 (05): : 591 - 596
  • [8] The impact of socio-economic status in rheumatoid arthritis
    Verstappen, Suzanne M. M.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 56 (07) : 1051 - 1052
  • [9] Rates of breastfeeding in Australia by State and socio-economic status: Evidence from the 1995 National Health Survey
    Donath, S
    Amir, LH
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2000, 36 (02) : 164 - 168
  • [10] The 'collateral impact' of pupil behaviour and geographically concentrated socio-economic disadvantage
    David, Alex Hugh
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2010, 31 (03) : 261 - 276