Multi-step tap-water quality forecasting in South Korea with transformer-based deep learning model

被引:0
|
作者
Cai, Danqi [1 ]
Chen, Kunwei [1 ]
Lin, Zhizhe [2 ]
Zhou, Jinglin [3 ]
Mo, Xinyue [2 ]
Zhou, Teng [2 ]
机构
[1] Shantou Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Shantou, Peoples R China
[2] Hainan Univ, Sch Cyberspace Secur, Haikou, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Sch Philosophy, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Tap water quality prediction; transformer model; time series forecasting; deep learning; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; TIME-SERIES; PREDICTION; ALGORITHM; LSTM;
D O I
10.1080/1573062X.2024.2399644
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The prediction of tap water quality serves as a pivotal component in enhancing water resource management. The intricate nonlinearity and inherent instability in water quality data make this task challenging. In this paper, we present a Tap-Water Quality Temporal Prediction Network (TWQ-TPN) to accurately predict tap-water quality by focusing on the impact of temporal nonlinear patterns and long-term seasonal fluctuations. To achieve this, we design two modules, namely the Temporal Feature Extraction Module (TFEM) and the Feature Transformation and Prediction Module (FTPM). The TFEM learns complex dynamic nonlinear features in the temporal domain. The FTPM is to realize feature transformation in the high-dimensional features for long-term seasonal fluctuations. Thus, our TWQ-TPN can accurately predict tap water quality trends to help improve water management. We validate TWQ-TPN's superiority using 5 years' data from 33 major water facilities in South Korea, demonstrating excellence in pH, turbidity, and residual chlorine. Ablation experiments support TWQ-TPN's rationale.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1120
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep Learning Methods for Predicting Tap-Water Quality Time Series in South Korea
    Im, Yunjeong
    Song, Gyuwon
    Lee, Junghyun
    Cho, Minsang
    WATER, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [2] Multi-modal multi-step wind power forecasting based on stacking deep learning model
    Xing, Zhikai
    He, Yigang
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 215
  • [3] Multi-step probabilistic forecasting model using deep learning parametrized distributions
    Serpell, Cristian
    Valle, Carlos
    Allende, Hector
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 27 (14) : 9479 - 9500
  • [4] Deep learning model on rates of change for multi-step ahead streamflow forecasting
    Tan, Woon Yang
    Lai, Sai Hin
    Pavitra, Kumar
    Teo, Fang Yenn
    El-Shafie, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2023, 25 (05) : 1667 - 1689
  • [5] Multi-step probabilistic forecasting model using deep learning parametrized distributions
    Cristián Serpell
    Carlos Valle
    Héctor Allende
    Soft Computing, 2023, 27 : 9479 - 9500
  • [6] Multi-step Ahead Urban Water Demand Forecasting Using Deep Learning Models
    Sahoo B.B.
    Panigrahi B.
    Nanda T.
    Tiwari M.K.
    Sankalp S.
    SN Computer Science, 4 (6)
  • [7] Multi-step rainfall forecasting using deep learning approach
    Narejo, Sanam
    Jawaid, Muhammad Moazzam
    Talpur, Shahnawaz
    Baloch, Rizwan
    Pasero, Eros Gian Alessandro
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021,
  • [8] Transformer-based deep learning architecture for time series forecasting
    Nayak, G. H. Harish
    Alam, Md Wasi
    Avinash, G.
    Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan
    Ray, Mrinmoy
    Barman, Samir
    Singh, K. N.
    Naik, B. Samuel
    Alam, Nurnabi Meherul
    Pal, Prasenjit
    Rathod, Santosha
    Bisen, Jaiprakash
    SOFTWARE IMPACTS, 2024, 22
  • [9] Multi-step water quality forecasting using a boosting ensemble multi-wavelet extreme learning machine model
    Barzegar, Rahim
    Moghaddam, Asghar Asghari
    Adamowski, Jan
    Ozga-Zielinski, Bogdan
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2018, 32 (03) : 799 - 813
  • [10] Multi-step water quality forecasting using a boosting ensemble multi-wavelet extreme learning machine model
    Rahim Barzegar
    Asghar Asghari Moghaddam
    Jan Adamowski
    Bogdan Ozga-Zielinski
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2018, 32 : 799 - 813