Constructing a measurement-based spatially explicit inventory of US oil and gas methane emissions (2021)

被引:1
|
作者
Omara, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Himmelberger, Anthony [2 ]
MacKay, Katlyn [1 ]
Williams, James P. [1 ]
Benmergui, Joshua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sargent, Maryann [3 ]
Wofsy, Steven C. [3 ]
Gautam, Ritesh [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Environm Def Fund, New York, NY 10010 USA
[2] MethaneSAT LLC, Austin, TX 78701 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Harvard John A Paulson Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
PERMIAN BASIN; WELL PADS; INVERSION; QUANTIFICATION; TRENDS; CANADA; PLANTS; STATES;
D O I
10.5194/essd-16-3973-2024
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Accurate and comprehensive quantification of oil and gas methane emissions is pivotal in informing effective methane mitigation policies while also supporting the assessment and tracking of progress towards emissions reduction targets set by governments and industry. While national bottom-up source-level inventories are useful for understanding the sources of methane emissions, they are often unrepresentative across spatial scales, and their reliance on generic emission factors produces underestimations when compared with measurement-based inventories. Here, we compile and analyze previously reported ground-based facility-level methane emissions measurements (n=1540) in the major US oil- and gas-producing basins and develop representative methane emission profiles for key facility categories in the US oil and gas supply chain, including well sites, natural-gas compressor stations, processing plants, crude-oil refineries, and pipelines. We then integrate these emissions data with comprehensive spatial data on national oil and gas activity to estimate each facility's mean total methane emissions and uncertainties for the year 2021, from which we develop a mean estimate of annual national methane emissions resolved at 0.1 degrees x 0.1 degrees spatial scales (similar to 10 km x 10 km). From this measurement-based methane emissions inventory (EI-ME), we estimate total US national oil and gas methane emissions of approximately 16 Tg (95 % confidence interval of 14-18 Tg) in 2021, which is similar to 2 times greater than the EPA Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Our estimate represents a mean gas-production-normalized methane loss rate of 2.6 %, consistent with recent satellite-based estimates. We find significant variability in both the magnitude and spatial distribution of basin-level methane emissions, ranging from production-normalized methane loss rates of < 1 % in the gas-dominant Appalachian and Haynesville regions to > 3 %-6 % in oil-dominant basins, including the Permian, Bakken, and the Uinta. Additionally, we present and compare novel comprehensive wide-area airborne remote-sensing data and results for total area methane emissions and the relative contributions of diffuse and concentrated methane point sources as quantified using MethaneAIR in 2021. The MethaneAIR assessment showed reasonable agreement with independent regional methane quantification results in sub-regions of the Permian and Uinta basins and indicated that diffuse area sources accounted for the majority of the total oil and gas emissions in these two regions. Our assessment offers key insights into plausible underlying drivers of basin-to-basin variabilities in oil and gas methane emissions, emphasizing the importance of integrating measurement-based data when developing high-resolution spatially explicit methane inventories in support of accurate methane assessment, attribution, and mitigation. The high-resolution spatially explicit EI-ME inventory is publicly available at 10.5281/zenodo.10734299 (Omara, 2024).
引用
收藏
页码:3973 / 3991
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] A measurement-based upstream oil and gas methane inventory for Alberta, Canada reveals higher emissions and different sources than official estimates
    Conrad, Bradley M.
    Tyner, David R.
    Li, Hugh Z.
    Xie, Donglai
    Johnson, Matthew R.
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [2] A measurement-based upstream oil and gas methane inventory for Alberta, Canada reveals higher emissions and different sources than official estimates
    Bradley M. Conrad
    David R. Tyner
    Hugh Z. Li
    Donglai Xie
    Matthew R. Johnson
    Communications Earth & Environment, 4
  • [3] Measurement-based carbon intensity of US offshore oil and gas production
    Gorchov Negron, Alan M.
    Kort, Eric A.
    Plant, Genevieve
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Chen, Yuanlei
    Hausman, Catherine
    Smith, Mackenzie L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [4] Spatially Explicit Methane Emissions from Petroleum Production and the Natural Gas System in California
    Jeong, Seongeun
    Millstein, Dev
    Fischer, Marc L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (10) : 5982 - 5990
  • [5] Assessment of methane emissions from the US oil and gas supply chain
    Alvarez, Ramon A.
    Zavala-Araiza, Daniel
    Lyon, David R.
    Allen, David T.
    Barkley, Zachary R.
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Davis, Kenneth J.
    Herndon, Scott C.
    Jacob, Daniel J.
    Karion, Anna
    Kort, Eric A.
    Lamb, Brian K.
    Lauvaux, Thomas
    Maasakkers, Joannes D.
    Marchese, Anthony J.
    Omara, Mark
    Pacala, Stephen W.
    Peischl, Jeff
    Robinson, Allen L.
    Shepson, Paul B.
    Sweeney, Colm
    Townsend-Small, Amy
    Wofsy, Steven C.
    Hamburg, Steven P.
    SCIENCE, 2018, 361 (6398) : 186 - 188
  • [6] Development of a spatially explicit inventory of methane emissions from Australia and its verification using atmospheric concentration data
    Wang, YP
    Bentley, ST
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (31) : 4965 - 4975
  • [7] Creating measurement-based oil and gas sector methane inventories using source-resolved aerial surveys
    Matthew R. Johnson
    Bradley M. Conrad
    David R. Tyner
    Communications Earth & Environment, 4
  • [8] Creating measurement-based oil and gas sector methane inventories using source-resolved aerial surveys
    Johnson, Matthew R.
    Conrad, Bradley M.
    Tyner, David R.
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [9] Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories
    Rutherford, Jeffrey S.
    Sherwin, Evan D.
    Ravikumar, Arvind P.
    Heath, Garvin A.
    Englander, Jacob
    Cooley, Daniel
    Lyon, David
    Omara, Mark
    Langfitt, Quinn
    Brandt, Adam R.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [10] Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories
    Jeffrey S. Rutherford
    Evan D. Sherwin
    Arvind P. Ravikumar
    Garvin A. Heath
    Jacob Englander
    Daniel Cooley
    David Lyon
    Mark Omara
    Quinn Langfitt
    Adam R. Brandt
    Nature Communications, 12