Safety assessment of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Chuanli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Pengyang [1 ]
Wu, Teng [1 ]
Fan, Yunhe [1 ]
Li, Qingqing [4 ]
Zhang, Jijun [1 ]
Shen, Xiaobing [2 ,3 ]
Dong, Xiushan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Tongji Shanxi Hosp, Shanxi Acad Med Sci, Hosp 3,Dept Gen Med,Shanxi Bethune Hosp, Taiyuan 030032, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Key Lab Environm Med Engn & Educ Minist, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Prevent Med, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Shanxi Med Univ, Shanxi Bethune Hosp, Tongji Shanxi Hosp, Shanxi Acad Med Sci,Hosp 3, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
关键词
neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists; adverse events; FAERS; real-world analysis; preferred term; CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NAUSEA; IFOSFAMIDE-INDUCED ENCEPHALOPATHY; DOUBLE-BLIND; APREPITANT; PREVENTION; FOSAPREPITANT; EFFICACY; NEPA; NETUPITANT/PALONOSETRON; PALONOSETRON;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2024.1413709
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant are three common neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1RAs) used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, following highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Understanding their different adverse event (AE) profiles may help clinicians make appropriate treatment decisions.Methods All data collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 underwent disproportionality analysis to detect, evaluate, and compare AE signals of the three NK-1RAs.Results A total of 3,904, 1,123, and 243 AE reports related to aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant, respectively, were extracted from the FAERS database. Of these, more than 50% of respondents were female, and most of them were aged 45-65 years. General disorders and administration-site conditions, and gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequent signals in the system organ class of the three NK-1RA drugs. In addition, aprepitant was strongly associated with joint deposit (ROR = 26.27) and fosaprepitant was closely related to seizure-like phenomena (ROR = 26.90); two preferred terms (PTs) were not mentioned in the manual. Statistically, netupitant was likely to induce death (N = 63, ROR = 8.78, 95% CI: 6.75-11.42). Additionally, neutropenic colitis, colitis, and stomatitis were unique to netupitant. Furthermore, the AE profiles of the three NK-1RA drugs were different by gender.Conclusion The AE profiles for aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant were different. In addition to paying attention to common AEs, clinicians need to pay attention to new emerging AEs, such as joint deposit, seizure-like phenomena, neutropenic colitis, colitis, and stomatitis, regarding the three NK-1RA drugs. Furthermore, the AE compositions of the three NK-1RA drugs were different in different genders, and clinicians should take these factors into account when selecting NK-1RAs for CINV treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety assessment of Brexpiprazole: Real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Jiang, Ying
    Zhou, Lingyun
    Shen, Yuan
    Zhou, Qin
    Ji, Yingying
    Zhu, Haohao
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 346 : 223 - 229
  • [2] Safety assessment of deutetrabenazine: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Shu, Yanping
    Wang, Yuanhe
    Liu, Jiaoying
    Hu, Lingyan
    Tong, Sichao
    Wu, Gang
    Zhu, Xianlin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [3] Safety assessment of tafamidis: a real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Chen, Min
    Huang, Yaping
    Ke, Chengjie
    Chen, Maohua
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2024,
  • [4] Safety assessment of apremilast: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Landong Ren
    Kaidi Zhao
    Bingqing Wang
    Shengxiang Xiao
    Jiashu Liu
    Chen Tu
    Archives of Dermatological Research, 317 (1)
  • [5] Safety assessment of cenobamate: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Chen, Shihao
    Fang, Wenqiang
    Zhao, Linqian
    Xu, Huiqin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [6] Safety assessment of tranexamic acid: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Tian, Ningsheng
    Sun, Yuxin
    Liu, Yingying
    Jin, Jie
    Chen, Shuai
    Han, Huawei
    Zhang, Ying
    Li, Zhiwei
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [7] Safety assessment of tolvaptan: real-world adverse event analysis using the FAERS database
    Cao, Peiyang
    Wang, Qian
    Wang, Yan
    Qiao, Qing
    Yan, Liyuan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [8] Safety assessment of disulfiram: real-world adverse event analysis based on FAERS database
    Luo, Jing
    Zeng, Yaqi
    Chen, Zhe
    Luo, Yaan
    Shi, Li
    Zhou, Xuhui
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [9] Safety assessment of Yasmin: Real-world adverse event analysis using the FAERS database
    Xu, Wenting
    Zhu, Lili
    Wang, Jiahui
    Shi, Lingli
    Tang, Xiuqin
    Chen, Qingli
    Wang, Lihong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 301 : 12 - 18
  • [10] Neratinib safety evaluation: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Fan, Yunhe
    Wu, Teng
    Xu, Pengyang
    Yang, Chuanli
    An, Jie
    Zhang, Haijia
    Abbas, Mureed
    Dong, Xiushan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15