One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Jia [1 ]
Chen, Gang [2 ]
Khadka, Jyoti [1 ,3 ]
Milte, Rachel [1 ]
Ratcliffe, Julie [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Hlth & Social Care Econ Grp, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Caulfield, Vic, Australia
[3] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst, Registry Sr Australians, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
QCE-ACC instrument; Discrete choice experiment; Aged care user-specific; Relative importance; Preference heterogeneity; Experienced-based value and general public value; OF-LIFE; HEALTH; PATIENT; VALUATIONS; ADAPTATION; COMMUNITY; DIGNITY; DISEASE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 +/- 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding unmet aged care need and care inequalities among older Australians
    Hill, Trish
    AGEING & SOCIETY, 2022, 42 (11) : 2665 - 2694
  • [2] Aged and Health Care Service Utilization by Older Australians Receiving Home Care Packages
    Thapaliya, Kailash
    Cornell, Victoria
    Lang, Catherine
    Caughey, Gillian E.
    Barker, Anna
    Evans, Keith
    Whitehead, Craig
    Wesselingh, Steve L.
    Inacio, Maria C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2023, 24 (03) : 395 - 399.e2
  • [3] The prevalence, trends and determinants of mental health disorders in older Australians living in permanent residential aged care: Implications for policy and quality of aged care services
    Amare, Azmeraw T.
    Caughey, Gillian E.
    Whitehead, Craig
    Lang, Catherine E.
    Bray, Sarah C. E.
    Corlis, Megan
    Visvanathan, Renuka
    Wesselingh, Steve
    Inacio, Maria C.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 54 (12): : 1200 - 1211
  • [4] Patterns and preferences for accessing health and aged care services in older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians
    Larke, Benjamin M.
    Broe, Gerald A.
    Daylight, Gail
    Draper, Brian
    Cumming, Robert G.
    Allan, Wendy
    Donovan, Terrence
    Costa, Daniel
    Lah, Suncica
    Radford, Kylie
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2021, 40 (02) : 145 - 153
  • [5] The dilemmas of antimicrobial stewardship in aged care: The perspectives of the family members of older Australians
    Degeling, Chris
    Hall, Julie
    Montgomery, Amy
    Singh, Saniya
    Mullan, Judy
    Williams, Jane
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2023, 50 : 117 - 123
  • [6] Anhedonia and anergia predict mortality in older Australians living in residential aged care
    Greenfield, L.
    Mathews, S.
    Toukhsati, S. R.
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 26 (03) : 614 - 622
  • [7] Interdependencies between Care Experience and Quality of Life Outcomes in Aged Care: An Empirical Investigation
    Song, Jia
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Milte, Rachel
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 : S76 - S76
  • [8] Pain in Older Australians Seeking Aged Care Services: Findings From the Registry of Older South Australians (ROSA)
    Inacio, Maria C.
    Visvanathan, Renuka
    Lang, Catherine E.
    Amare, Azmeraw
    Harrison, Stephanie L.
    Wesselingh, Steve
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (01) : 132 - 133
  • [9] What defines quality of care for older people in aged care? A comprehensive literature review
    Cleland, Jenny
    Hutchinson, Claire
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Milte, Rachel
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 21 (09) : 765 - 778
  • [10] Assessing feasibility, construct validity, and reliability of a new aged care-specific preference-based quality of life instrument: evidence from older Australians in residential aged care
    Khadka, J.
    Hutchinson, C.
    Milte, R.
    Cleland, J.
    Muller, A.
    Bowes, N.
    Ratcliffe, J.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2022, 20 (01)