Treatment of trigger finger with metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis vs relative motion extension orthosis: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Yendi, Burcu [1 ]
Atilgan, Esra [2 ]
Namaldi, Seda [1 ]
Kuru, Cigdem Ayhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Phys Therapy & Rehabil, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Orthot Prosthet, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Relative motion splint; Satisfaction; Pain; Function; Triggering; Static splint; SPLINT; MANAGEMENT; HAND; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jht.2023.10.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis (MCPJ-BO) is one of the first-line orthotic treatment for patients with trigger finger (TF). Relative motion extension orthosis (RME-O) has recently emerged as a treatment option for various hand disorders involving TF. Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 6 weeks of orthotic treatment with the MCPJ-BO and the RME-O for pain relief. Function and satisfaction with the orthosis were assessed as secondary objectives. Study design: Randomized clinical study. Methods: Thirty patients with an average age of 50 years with Froimson stage 1-3 A1 pulley triggering participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the MCPJ-BO (n = 15; 10 females, five males) or the RME-O group (n = 15; 12 females, three males). The orthoses were worn full time for 6 weeks. All patients received patient education, activity modification, and flexor tendon gliding exercises as part of the rehabilitation program. Pre- and post-assessments included Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to analyze the difference between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in pain and function before treatment (p < 0.05). Within-group comparisons indicated that both orthoses relieved pain, but the MCPJ-BO group achieved greater pain relief (p = 0.001). There was a significant improvement in function in the MCPJ-BO group, with a mean change of 12.7 (p = 0.0001). The overall success rates for the MCPJ-BO group and RME-O group were 60% and 27%, respectively. Patients in both groups had high satisfaction with the orthosis. Conclusions: MCPJ-BO and RME-O could be used for pain relief in the treatment of TF. The MCPJ-BO appears to be more effective than the RME-O in improving function.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 318
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of proximal interphalangeal joint-blocking orthosis vs metacarpophalangeal joint-blocking orthosis in trigger digit management: A randomized clinical trial
    Teo, Sing Hwee
    Ng, Dinnie Chen Li
    Wong, Yoko Kin Yoke
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2019, 32 (04) : 444 - 451
  • [2] Relative motion splints versus metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splints in the management of trigger finger: Study protocol for a randomized comparative trial
    Leong, Li Xian
    Chai, Siaw Chui
    Howell, Julianne W.
    Rasdi, Hanif Farhan Mohd
    Rahman, Nur Rahimawati Abdul
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [3] Orthosis vs. exercise for the treatment of adult idiopathic trigger fingers: A randomized clinical trial
    Nadar, Mohammed Sh.
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 48 (06) : 713 - 719
  • [4] A novel approach to managing closed mallet finger injuries: The addition of a relative motion extension orthosis to a mallet orthosis in patients with proximal interphalangeal joint hyperextension
    Odewahn, Nicole
    Clark, Tracey
    Varey, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2023, 36 (02) : 494 - 498
  • [5] Evaluation of Hand Function Using Relative Motion Extension Concept (with or Without Night Wrist Orthosis) or Dynamic Extension Orthosis for Extensor Tendon Injuries in Zones 4-6-A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bojnec, Vida
    Vidmar, Jerneja
    Suznik, Zvezdana
    Koprivnik, Aleksandra Oroz
    Skrlec, Milena Spes
    Frangez, Masa
    Majdic, Neza
    Vidmar, Gaj
    Papez, Breda Jesensek
    LIFE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [6] Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: extended follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing orthosis versus no orthosis
    Urquhart, Jennifer C.
    Alrehaili, Osama A.
    Fisher, Charles G.
    Fleming, Alyssa
    Rasoulinejad, Parham
    Gurr, Kevin
    Bailey, Stewart I.
    Siddiqi, Fawaz
    Bailey, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 27 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [7] Comparison of thoracolumbosacral orthosis and no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: interim analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical equivalence trial Clinical article
    Bailey, Christopher S.
    Dvorak, Marcel F.
    Thomas, Kenneth C.
    Boyd, Michael C.
    Paquett, Scott
    Kwon, Brian K.
    France, John
    Gurr, Kevin R.
    Bailey, Stewart I.
    Fisher, Charles G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 11 (03) : 295 - 303
  • [8] Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: extended follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing orthosis versus no orthosis Response
    Bailey, Chris S.
    Urquhart, Jennifer C.
    Fisher, Charles G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 28 (01) : 128 - 129
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial of the effect of 2-step orthosis treatment for a mallet finger of tendinous origin
    Saito, Kazuo
    Kihara, Hitoshi
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2016, 29 (04) : 433 - 439
  • [10] An in-depth look at zone III and IV anatomy of the finger extensor mechanism and some clinical implications for use of the relative motion flexion orthosis
    van Strien, Gwendolyn
    van Zwieten, Koos Jaap
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2023, 36 (02) : 280 - 293