Should Environmentalists Support the Gasoline Tax?
被引:0
|
作者:
Millard-Ball, Adam
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Luskin Sch Publ Affairs, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, Luskin Sch Publ Affairs, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
Millard-Ball, Adam
[1
]
Guerra, Erick
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Penn, Weitzman Sch Design, Philadelphia, PA USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, Luskin Sch Publ Affairs, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
Guerra, Erick
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Luskin Sch Publ Affairs, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Weitzman Sch Design, Philadelphia, PA USA
Taxes on gasoline and diesel reduce vehicle travel by making driving more expensive, which is known as the price effect. But fuel tax revenue is used to build and widen urban highways, inducing more driving, which is the capacity effect. We have shown that in the United States, the capacity effect from 1981 to 2021 was more than five times greater than the price effect. As the rise of electric vehicles forces policymakers to consider replacing or supplementing fuel taxes, our findings highlight the need to decouple the two functions-revenue and environmental-of taxes on driving. The use of gasoline taxes to fund highway capacity expansion undermines their environmental role.