Systematic Review of the Global Use of Validated Questionnaires in the Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women

Introduction:Our goal was to systematically review the most commonly used validated questionnaires in recent global literature on stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment.Methods:PubMed, Embase, and Ovid databases were queried for manuscripts containing "female stress urinary incontinence" AND "diagnosis" AND "treatment" AND "questionnaire." Two independent reviewers screened studies for randomized controlled trials, prospective, and retrospective studies between 2018 and 2023. Exclusion criteria included male participants, non-SUI incontinence, and articles not originally written in English. The review was registered in PROSPERO [465721] and conformed to PRISMA guidelines.Results:In 117 manuscripts meeting study criteria, the median of the mean ages was 52 years, with a median of 164 participants per study. Most studies originated in Europe (59/117). The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form was the most frequently used (52%), followed by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (31%), the Urinary Distress Inventory 6 Short Form (25%), the Incontinence Quality of Life (20%), and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form (19%). These leading questionnaires were short, translated into several languages, and globally addressed important SUI-related domains, including the presence and severity of SUI, additional lower urinary tract symptoms, and the impact of SUI on quality of life, as well as changes perceived after treatment.Conclusions:This systematic review of the validated questionnaires used in contemporary SUI management literature could help guide recommendations for incorporating these favored instruments into future SUI treatment outcome documents.