Optimal reliability to retrofit structures damaged by earthquakes from the perspective of the life-cycle cost

被引:0
|
作者
De Leon, David [1 ]
Esteva, Luis [2 ]
Delgado, David [3 ]
Carlos Arteaga, Juan [4 ]
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Mexico State, Engn Sch, Cuidad Univ, Toluca 50000, Estado De Mexic, Mexico
[2] UNAM, Inst Engn, Ingn S-N,CU, Ciudad De Mexico 04510, Mexico
[3] Autonomous Univ Mexico State, Engn Sch, Cuidad Univ, Toluca 50000, Estado De Mexic, Mexico
[4] Autonomous Univ Mexico State, Sci Sch, Cuidad Univ, Toluca 50000, Estado De Mexic, Mexico
关键词
Optimal retrofit; Seismic hazard; Expected life-cycle cost; Number of earthquake in the lifetime; Building importance; SEISMIC RETROFIT; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118913
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
When an earthquake damages a building, the type and increment on safety level of the retrofit may not be very clear. If that increment is not too large, the next earthquake may produce even more damages to the building; also, the building importance and the seismic hazard levels play a role on that decision. The criterion of minimizing the expected value of the building life-cycle cost brings some guide on that issue. This paper proposes the use of the expected life-cycle cost to identify what is the reliability level which is convenient for the retrofit. The procedure is illustrated by assessing three buildings with different damage level, different level of damage/failure consequences and different seismic hazard. For a school with a damage index of 0.2, a level of damage/failure consequences not so high and a moderate level of seismic hazard, the optimal failure probability for the retrofit is 1.2 * 10(-3). However, for buildings with a damage index of 0.3, and with higher level of damage/failure consequences, and under higher level of seismic hazard, the optimal failure probability for retrofit ranges from 2 to 8 * 10(-4).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life-cycle cost optimization of the seismic retrofit of existing RC structures
    Vitiello, U.
    Asprone, D.
    Di Ludovico, M.
    Prota, A.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 15 (05) : 2245 - 2271
  • [2] Life-cycle cost optimization of the seismic retrofit of existing RC structures
    U. Vitiello
    D. Asprone
    M. Di Ludovico
    A. Prota
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15 : 2245 - 2271
  • [3] Determining the Optimal Structural Target Reliability of a Structure with a Minimal Life-Cycle Cost Perspective
    Kim, Sang-Hyo
    Choi, Moon-Seock
    Cho, Kwang-Il
    Park, Se-Jun
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 16 (12) : 2075 - 2091
  • [4] Cost-reliability interaction in life-cycle cost optimization of deteriorating structures
    Kong, JS
    Frangopol, DM
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (11) : 1704 - 1712
  • [5] RELIABILITY INVESTMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE COST
    SEGER, JK
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1983, 32 (03) : 259 - 263
  • [6] Optimal integration of life-cycle cost and structural reliability in bridge management
    Frangopol, DM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING IN CIVIL AND BUILDING ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-4, 1997, : 557 - 564
  • [7] Optimal bridge management based on lifetime reliability and life-cycle cost
    Frangopol, DM
    Estes, AC
    Augusti, G
    Ciampoli, M
    OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE OF CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 1998, : 98 - 115
  • [8] Optimal redistribution: A life-cycle perspective
    Michau, Jean-Baptiste
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2014, 111 : 1 - 16
  • [9] Optimal seismic retrofit and maintenance strategy for steel bridges using Life-Cycle Cost analysis
    Cho, Hyo-Nam
    Choi, Hyun-Ho
    Lee, Kwang-Min
    Park, Kyung-Hoon
    LIFE-CYCLE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2007, : 121 - 130
  • [10] Optimal target reliability of bridges based on minimum life-cycle cost consideration
    Wang, JJ
    Ang, AHS
    Lee, JC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FOR YOUNG EXPERTS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2002, : 618 - 623