Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management

被引:1
|
作者
Gatineau, Guillaume [1 ]
Shevroja, Enisa [1 ]
Vendrami, Colin [1 ]
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Elena [1 ]
Leslie, William D. [2 ,3 ]
Lamy, Olivier [4 ,5 ]
Hans, Didier [1 ]
机构
[1] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Interdisciplinary Ctr Bone Dis, Bone & Joint Dept, Rheumatol Unit, Av Pierre Decker 4, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Av Pierre Decker 4, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Med, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Internal Med Dept, Internal Med Unit, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Univ Lausanne, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Analysis/quantitation of bone; osteoporosis; orthopaedics; fracture risk assessment; screening; HIP FRACTURE; MACHINE; MORTALITY; SELECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/jbmr/zjae131
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
An abundance of medical data and enhanced computational power have led to a surge in artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Published studies involving AI in bone and osteoporosis research have increased exponentially, raising the need for transparent model development and reporting strategies. This review offers a comprehensive overview and systematic quality assessment of AI articles in osteoporosis while highlighting recent advancements. A systematic search in the PubMed database, from December 17, 2020 to February 1, 2023 was conducted to identify AI articles that relate to osteoporosis. The quality assessment of the studies relied on the systematic evaluation of 12 quality items derived from the minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modeling checklist. The systematic search yielded 97 articles that fell into 5 areas; bone properties assessment (11 articles), osteoporosis classification (26 articles), fracture detection/classification (25 articles), risk prediction (24 articles), and bone segmentation (11 articles). The average quality score for each study area was 8.9 (range: 7-11) for bone properties assessment, 7.8 (range: 5-11) for osteoporosis classification, 8.4 (range: 7-11) for fracture detection, 7.6 (range: 4-11) for risk prediction, and 9.0 (range: 6-11) for bone segmentation. A sixth area, AI-driven clinical decision support, identified the studies from the 5 preceding areas that aimed to improve clinician efficiency, diagnostic accuracy, and patient outcomes through AI-driven models and opportunistic screening by automating or assisting with specific clinical tasks in complex scenarios. The current work highlights disparities in study quality and a lack of standardized reporting practices. Despite these limitations, a wide range of models and examination strategies have shown promising outcomes to aid in the earlier diagnosis and improve clinical decision-making. Through careful consideration of sources of bias in model performance assessment, the field can build confidence in AI-based approaches, ultimately leading to improved clinical workflows and patient outcomes. This review covers the recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) for managing osteoporosis, an increasingly prevalent condition that weakens bone tissues and increases fracture risk. Analyzing 97 studies from December 2020 to February 2023, the present work highlights how AI enhances bone properties assessment, osteoporosis classification, fracture detection and classification, risk prediction, and bone segmentation.A systematic qualitative assessment of the studies revealed improvements in study quality compared with the earlier review period, supported by innovative and more explainable AI approaches. AI shows promise in clinical decision support by offering novel screening tools that can help in the earlier identification of the disease, improve clinical workflows, and patient prognosis. New pre-processing strategies and advanced model architectures have played a critical role in these improvements.Researchers have enhanced the accuracy and predictive performance of traditional methods by integrating clinical data with imaging data through advanced multi-factorial AI techniques. These innovations, paired with standardized development and validation processes, promise to personalize medicine and enhance patient care in osteoporosis management. Graphical Abstract
引用
收藏
页码:1553 / 1573
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SOLUTIONS FOR OSTEOPOROSIS MANAGEMENT AND PERCEPTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Dumic-Cule, I.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (SUPPL 1) : S95 - S96
  • [2] Data Management in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Radiology Reporting
    Bizzo, Bernardo C.
    Almeida, Renata R.
    Alkasab, Tarik K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (11) : 1485 - 1488
  • [3] Structured reporting and artificial intelligence
    Hempel, Johann-Martin
    dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
    RADIOLOGE, 2021, 61 (11): : 999 - 1004
  • [4] Artificial intelligence insights into osteoporosis: comment
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 36 (02) : 351 - 351
  • [5] Artificial intelligence, osteoporosis and fragility fractures
    Ferizi, Uran
    Honig, Stephen
    Chang, Gregory
    CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 31 (04) : 368 - 375
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence Enabling Radiology Reporting
    Bizzo, Bernardo C.
    Almeida, Renata R.
    Alkasab, Tarik K.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 59 (06) : 1045 - 1052
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence Approach for Variant Reporting
    Zomnir, Michael G.
    Lipkin, Lev
    Pacula, Maciej
    Meneses, Enrique Dominguez
    MacLeay, Allison
    Duraisarny, Sekhar
    Nadhamuni, Nishchal
    Al Turki, Saeed H.
    Zheng, Zongli
    Rivera, Miguel
    Nardi, Valentina
    Dias-Santagata, Dora
    Le, Long P.
    Lennerz, Jochen K.
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2018, 2 : 1 - 13
  • [8] Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models
    Collins, Gary S.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    LANCET, 2019, 393 (10181): : 1577 - 1579
  • [9] Artificial intelligence aids in development of nanomedicines for cancer management
    Tan, Ping
    Chen, Xiaoting
    Zhang, Hu
    Wei, Qiang
    Luo, Kui
    SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2023, 89 : 61 - 75
  • [10] Artificial intelligence in personnel management: the development of APM model
    Chang, Kirk
    BOTTOM LINE, 2020, 33 (04): : 377 - 388