Supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for pharmaceutical products are an important complement to patent protection which is often inadequate in commercial terms. SPCs are designed to ensure that originators can amortize their high investments in research and clinical trials. But unlike in the USA, for example, the European SPC is not simply a patent term extension. Rather, it is a unique form of intellectual property right whose subject matter is not the overall patented invention, but the active ingredient or combination of active ingredients of a patented and authorized pharmaceutical product. This link between the basic patent and market authorization has led to many questions of interpretation and Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rulings since the SPC Regulation was adopted. An issue that has not yet been decided by the CJEU concerns the discrepancy between the ownership of the patent and the marketing authorisation under pharmaceutical law. This scenario, in which a patent proprietor relies on the marketing authorisation of a third party (possibly even a competitor) in said patent proprietor's application for an SPC, is also referred to as "SPC squatting". The following article discusses the admissibility of such a practice de lege lata, which also becomes relevant in light of current reform efforts by the legislator.
