Assessing the quality of breast cancer-related videos on TikTok: A cross-sectional study

被引:1
|
作者
Qu, Yang [1 ]
Lian, Jie [1 ]
Pan, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [1 ]
Zhou, Yidong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
Breast cancer; TikTok; video quality assessment; social media; short video apps; SOCIAL MEDIA; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1177/20552076241277688
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Breast cancer, the most common cancer in women globally, highlights the need for patient education. Despite many breast cancer discussions on TikTok, their scientific evaluation is lacking. Our study seeks to assess the content quality and accuracy of popular TikTok videos on breast cancer, to improve the dissemination of health knowledge. Methods: On August 22, 2023, we collected the top 100 trending videos from TikTok's Chinese version using "breast cancer/breast nodule" as keywords. We noted their length, TikTok duration, likes, comments, favorites, reposts, uploader types, and topics. Four assessment tools were used: Goobie's six questions, the Patient Educational Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT), the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), and the Global Quality Score (GQS). These instruments evaluate videos based on content, informational integrity, and overall quality. Results: Among the 100 videos, content quality was low with Goobie's questions mostly scoring 0, except for management at 1.0 (QR 1.0). PEMAT scores were moderate: 54.1 (QR 1.6) for sum, 47.0 (QR 18.8) for PEMAT-A, and 52.3 (QR 11.7) for PEMAT-U. Regarding the quality of information, the VIQI (sum) median was 14.1 (QR 0.2). Additionally, the median GQS score was 3.5 (QR 0.1). Medical professionals' videos focused on breast cancer stages, while patient videos centered on personal experiences. Patient videos had lower content and overall quality compared to those by medical professionals (PEMAT, GQS: P < 0.001, P = 0.004) but received more comments, indicating higher engagement (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: TikTok's breast cancer content shows educational potential, but while informational quality is moderate, content quality needs improvement. Videos by medical professionals are of higher quality. We recommend increased involvement of healthcare professionals on TikTok to enhance content quality. Non-medical users should share verified information, and TikTok should strengthen its content vetting. Users must scrutinize the credibility of health information on social platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China
    Liu, Hui
    Peng, Jialun
    Li, Lu
    Deng, Ao
    Huang, Xiangxin
    Yin, Guobin
    Ming, Jia
    Luo, Haojun
    Liang, Yinyin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 11
  • [2] Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study
    Zheng, Shusen
    Tong, Xinyu
    Wan, Dalong
    Hu, Chen
    Hu, Qing
    Ke, Qinghong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [3] Information quality of videos related to Helicobacter pylori infection on TikTok: Cross-sectional study
    Tan, Wei
    Liu, Yilong
    Shi, Zhiwen
    Zheng, Bainan
    Feng, Lingmei
    Wang, Jian
    Wang, Xiaohang
    Yuan, Zongli
    HELICOBACTER, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [4] Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study
    Sun, Fei
    Zheng, Shusen
    Wu, Jian
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [5] Quality of information in gestational diabetes mellitus videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional study
    Jiang, Genyan
    Chen, Lei
    Geng, Lan
    Zhang, Yuhan
    Chen, Zhiqi
    Zhu, Yaqi
    Ma, Shuangshuang
    Zhao, Mei
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (02):
  • [6] Evaluating the Quality of Cancer-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study
    Pan, Peng
    Yu, Changhua
    Li, Tao
    Dai, Tingting
    Tian, Hanhan
    Xiong, Yaozu
    Lv, Jie
    Hu, Xiaochu
    Ma, Weidong
    Yin, Wenda
    JMIR CANCER, 2024, 10
  • [7] Evaluating the Quality of Life and Sleep Quality in Saudi Women with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study
    Tamam, Nissren
    Al-Mugren, K. S.
    Alrebdi, H., I
    Sulieman, Abdelmoneim
    Abdelbasset, Walid Kamal
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2021, 20
  • [8] The quality and reliability of short videos about thyroid nodules on BiliBili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study
    Chen, Yuying
    Wang, Qianyu
    Huang, Xuanwei
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Yuanhui
    Ni, Tianyu
    Pan, Gang
    Luo, Dingcun
    Ni, Yeqin
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [9] TikTok and #Psoriasis: A cross-sectional study of content quality
    Aghajani, Marra
    Aghajani, Rhian
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 64 : 23 - 24
  • [10] Shoulder and scapulothoracic impairments in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema in the upper limb: A cross-sectional study shoulder and breast cancer-related lymphedema
    Rezende, Monique Silva
    Rossi, Denise Martineli
    de Lima, Aline Maria Ribeiro
    Clemente, Giovani Sanches
    de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani
    Guirro, Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2024, 37 : 177 - 182