The adult ADHD assessment quality assurance standard

被引:2
|
作者
Adamou, Marios [1 ,2 ]
Arif, Muhammad [3 ]
Asherson, Philip [4 ]
Cubbin, Sally [5 ]
Leaver, Laurence [6 ]
Sedgwick-Mueller, Jane [7 ,8 ]
Mueller-Sedgwick, Ulrich [7 ,9 ,10 ]
van Rensburg, Kobus [11 ]
Kustow, James [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Huddersfield, Sch Human & Hlth Sci, Huddersfield, England
[2] South West Yorkshire Partnership Natl Hlth Serv NH, Adult ADHD Clin, Huddersfield, England
[3] Leicestershire Partnership Natl Hlth Serv NHS Trus, Adult ADHD Clin, Leicester, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Social Genet & Dev Psychiat, London, England
[5] Manor Hosp, Adult ADHD Clin, Oxford, England
[6] Green Templeton Coll, Oxford, England
[7] Govt Jersey, Hlth & Community Serv, St Helier, Jersey, England
[8] Kings Coll London, Fac Nursing Midwifery & Palliat Care, London, England
[9] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
[10] Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth Natl Hlth Serv NHS, Adult ADHD Serv, London, England
[11] Private Practitioner, Northampton, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; adult ADHD; practice guidelines; diagnostic assessment; quality standard assessment; ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS; BRITISH-ASSOCIATION; COVID-19; RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOLESCENTS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1380410
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) frequently persists into adulthood. There are practice guidelines that outline the requirements for the assessment and treatment of adults. Nevertheless, guidelines specifying what constitutes a good quality diagnostic assessment and report and the competencies required to be a specialist assessor are lacking. This can lead to variation in the quality and reliability of adult ADHD assessments. Poor quality assessments may not be accepted as valid indicators of the presence of ADHD by other clinicians or services, resulting in wasteful re-assessments and delays in providing treatment. To address this issue the UK Adult ADHD Network (UKAAN) proposes a quality framework for adult ADHD assessments - the Adult ADHD Assessment Quality Assurance Standard (AQAS). Methods: The co-authors agreed on five questions or themes that then guided the development of a set of consensus statements. An initial draft was reviewed and amended in an iterative process to reach a final consensus. Results: What constitutes a high-quality diagnostic assessment and report was agreed by consensus of the co-authors. The resulting guideline emphasises the need to evaluate impairment, describes core competencies required by the assessor and highlights the importance of linking the diagnosis to an appropriate post-diagnostic discussion. Assessments should be completed in the context of a full psychiatric and neurodevelopmental review, and need good interview skills, using a semi-structured interview with open questioning and probing to elicit real life examples of symptoms and impairments. It is recommended that 2 hours or more is required for an adequate assessment including both the diagnostic assessment and initial post-assessment discussions. Conclusion: The AQAS has been developed as a practical resource to support reliable and valid diagnostic assessments of adult ADHD. It is intended to complement formal training. A secondary objective is to empower patients by providing them with evidence-based information on what to expect from an assessment and assessment report.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条