A comparative nutritional life cycle assessment of processed and unprocessed soy-based meat and milk alternatives including protein quality adjustment

被引:0
|
作者
Herrmann, Moritz [1 ]
Mehner, Eric [1 ]
Egger, Lotti [2 ]
Portmann, Reto [2 ]
Hammer, Laila [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Nemecek, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Agroscope, Life Cycle Assessment Res Grp, Environm & Resources, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Agroscope, Biochem Milk & Microorganisms Res Grp, Methods Dev & Analyt, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Div Human Nutr, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Southern Switzerland SUPSI, Swiss Distant Univ Appl Sci FFHS, Dept Hlth, Manno, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
plant-based; meat analogue; soy drink; DIAAS; NRF; ultra-processed food; LCA; sustainability; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FOOD;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2024.1413802
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Efforts towards sustainable food systems have stimulated the development of plant-based alternatives to meat and milk. However, the debate on the nutritional quality of (processed) plant products compared to animal products remains unresolved, and combined assessments are needed to assess the benefits and trade-offs of these products in future diets. Using life cycle assessment (LCA) combined with nutrient density measurements and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS), this case study evaluates different processing stages of soy-based products, including cooked soybeans, tofu, soy drink, and a processed soy-based meat analogue (SBMA) produced in Switzerland. The nutritional LCA (n-LCA) showed that the environmental impact of all soy-based meat alternatives was 4-20 times lower than that of beef, especially when locally sourced soy was used. The differences were smaller when compared to chicken meat. All soy-based products showed lower DIAAS compared to animal products, but the results from the combined n-LCA were always less favourable for animal products in this case study. Contribution analyses showed that despite the high level of processing, the raw materials contributed significantly to the environmental footprint of SBMA, exceeding 50% in some environmental impact categories. Moreover, comparisons within the soy-based alternatives revealed a lower environmental impact of the minimally processed products. The higher protein quality and quantity of the processed SBMA were not sufficient to offset its higher environmental impact in this case study. SBMA also contained highest level of sodium and saturated fatty acids, highlighting the need for careful food formulation. Overall, this study showed the potential of soy-based alternatives to meat and milk to reduce the environmental impact of food production whilst highlighting the importance of considering their nutritional quality and the role of processing. Overall, this research provides insight into the potential of plant-based alternatives to meat and milk for sustainable diets amid the global challenge of climate change and changing dietary patterns.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Perspective: Soy-based Meat and Dairy Alternatives, Despite Classification as Ultra-processed Foods, Deliver High-quality Nutrition on Par with Unprocessed or Minimally Processed Animal-based Counterparts
    Messina, Mark
    Sievenpiper, John L.
    Williamson, Patricia
    Kiel, Jessica
    Erdman, John W., Jr.
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2022, 13 (03) : 726 - 738
  • [2] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Milk and Plant-Based Alternatives
    Grant, Courtney A.
    Hicks, Andrea L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2018, 35 (11) : 1235 - 1247
  • [3] COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF SOY AND MILK PROTEIN-QUALITY IN INFANT CEBUS MONKEYS
    AUSMAN, LM
    GALLINA, DL
    HAYES, KC
    HEGSTED, DM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1986, 43 (01): : 112 - 127
  • [4] A review on nutritional quality of animal and plant-based milk alternatives: a focus on protein
    Karoui, Romdhane
    Bouaicha, Ines
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2024, 11
  • [5] High protein diets enhance glycemic regulation during energy restriction: a comparative analysis of milk- and soy-based diets
    Lin, Gregory
    Murphy, Nancy
    Gaffney-Stomberg, Erin
    Young, Andrew
    McClung, James
    Pasiakos, Stefan
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2014, 28 (01):
  • [6] High protein diets enhance body composition in rats: a comparative analysis of milk-and soy-based energy restricted diets
    Pasiakos, Stefan M.
    Wulff, Charles R.
    Murphy, Nancy E.
    Gaffney-Stomberg, Erin
    Young, Andrew J.
    McClung, James P.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2013, 27
  • [7] SOY PROTEIN FORMULA AND A MILK-BASED FORMULA - COMPARATIVE EVALUATION IN MILK-TOLERANT INFANTS SHOWED NO SIGNIFICANT NUTRITIONAL DIFFERENCES
    JUNG, AL
    CARR, SL
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 1977, 16 (11) : 982 - 985
  • [8] Development and application of a nutritional quality model for life cycle assessment of protein-rich foods
    Fernandez-Rios, Ana
    Batlle-Bayer, Laura
    Azarkamand, Sahar
    Laso, Jara
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    Bala, Alba
    Puig, Rita
    Aldaco, Ruben
    Margallo, Maria
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 50 : 35 - 44
  • [9] Comparison of life cycle assessments and nutritional contents of soy protein and wheat protein (seitan) based vegan bacon products for human and environmental health
    Yusuf, Emel Hasan
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2023, 103 (07) : 3315 - 3321
  • [10] Unpacking bio-based alternatives to ethylene production in Brazil, Europe, and the United States: A comparative life cycle assessment
    Zanon-Zotin, Marianne
    Bergman-Fonte, Clarissa
    Morais, Taisa Nogueira
    Maia, Pedro Luiz Barbosa
    Carvalho, Lucas
    Angelkorte, Gerd
    Fiorini, Ana Carolina Oliveira
    Rochedo, Pedro Rua Rodriguez
    Portugal-Pereira, Joana
    Szklo, Alexandre
    Schaeffer, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 428