Outcomes of female reproductive performance with assisted reproductive techniques after recent mild to moderate COVID-19 infections: An observational study

被引:0
|
作者
Moini, Ashraf [1 ,2 ]
Najafpour, Narges [1 ]
Kashani, Ladan [1 ]
Farid-Mojtahedi, Maryam [1 ]
Maleki-Hajiagha, Arezoo [3 ]
Tehranian, Afsaneh [1 ,4 ]
Karimi, Rana [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Arash Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, POB 1653915981,Rashid Ave,Resalat Highway, Tehran, Iran
[2] ACECR, Royan Inst Reprod Biomed, Reprod Biomed Res Ctr, Dept Endocrinol & Female Infertil, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Anat, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Arash Womens Hosp, Res Dev Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Advanced maternal age; Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy; Recurrent implantation failure; Recurrent pregnancy loss; Severe male factor infertility; FOLLICULAR-FLUID; CUMULUS CELLS; WOMEN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.5653/cerm.2023.06352
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on clinical outcomes among high-risk patients. Methods: This retrospective study involved 1,368 patients and the same number of cycles, including 520 cycles with PGT-A and 848 cycles without PGT-A. The study participants comprised women of advanced maternal age (AMA) and those affected by recurrent implantation failure (RIF), recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), or severe male factor infertility (SMF). Results: PGT-A was associated with significant improvements in the implantation rate (IR) and the ongoing pregnancy rate/live birth rate (OPR/LBR) per embryo transfer cycle in the AMA (39.3% vs. 16.2% [p<0.001] p <0.001] and 42.0% vs. 21.8% [p<0.001], p <0.001], respectively), RIF (41.7% vs. 22.0% [p<0.001] p <0.001] and 47.0% vs. 28.6% [p<0.001], p <0.001], respectively), and RPL (45.6% vs. 19.5% [p<0.001] p <0.001] and 49.1% vs. 24.2% [p<0.001], p <0.001], respectively) groups, as well as the IR in the SMF group (43.3% vs. 26.5%, p =0.011). Additionally, PGT-A was associated with lower overall incidence rates of pregnancy loss in the AMA (16.7% vs. 34.3%, p =0.001) and RPL (16.7% vs. 50.0%, p <0.001) groups. However, the OPR/LBR per total cycle across all PGT-A groups did not significantly exceed that for the control groups. Conclusion: PGT-A demonstrated beneficial effects in high-risk patients. However, our findings indicate that these benefits are more pronounced in carefully selected candidates than in the entire high-risk patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 275
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical and Embryological Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques
    Banker, Manish
    Arora, Parul
    Banker, Jwal
    Shah, Anand
    Gupta, Reena
    Shah, Sandeep
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (02) : 150 - 156
  • [2] COVID-19 Vaccines and Assisted Reproductive Techniques: A Systematic Review
    Satorres-Perez, Elena
    Martinez-Varea, Alicia
    Morales-Rosello, Jose
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [3] Mild and Asymptomatic Covid-19 Infections: Implications for Maternal, Fetal, and Reproductive Health
    Sun, Bei
    Yeh, John
    FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 2
  • [4] Recent trends in assisted reproductive techniques and associated outcomes
    Cramer, DW
    Liberman, RF
    Powers, D
    Hornstein, MD
    McShane, P
    Barbieri, RL
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (01): : 61 - 66
  • [5] Fertility Outcomes in Women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Treatments after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Satwik, Ruma
    Majumdar, Abha
    Mittal, Shweta
    Tiwari, Neeti
    Majumdar, Gaurav
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2024, 18 (03) : 207 - 214
  • [6] Effect of female COVID-19 vaccination on assisted reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kleebayoon, Amnuay
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (06) : 1087 - 1087
  • [7] An Overview on Guidelines on COVID-19 Virus and Natural and Assisted Reproductive Techniques Pregnancies
    Pirjani, Reihaneh
    Rabiei, Maryam
    Abiri, Ameneh
    Moini, Ashraf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2020, 14 (03) : 264 - 271
  • [8] Assisted Reproductive Technology During COVID-19: A Population-Based Study Of Pregnancy Outcomes
    Wei, Shu Qin
    Luu, Thuy Mai
    Ayoub, Aimina
    Lewin, Antoine
    Auger, Nathalie
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2024, 31 (11) : 3334 - 3342
  • [9] Potential Impact of COVID-19 on Female Reproductive Health
    Kumari, Nisha
    Kumari, Neha
    Mishra, Sumit
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2023, 27 (01): : 92 - 96
  • [10] COVID-19 disease does not cause ovarian injury in women of reproductive age: an observational before-and-after COVID-19 study
    Madendag, Ilknur Col
    Madendag, Yusuf
    Ozdemir, Ayse Turunc
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (01) : 153 - 158