Treatment expectations of patients and clinicians: a cross-sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Jiarui [1 ]
Xiao, Chunfeng [1 ]
Li, Tao [1 ]
Duan, Yanping [1 ]
Jiang, Yinan [1 ]
Shi, Lili [1 ]
Hong, Xia [1 ]
Geng, Wenqi [1 ]
Hu, Jiaojiao [1 ]
Wang, Yufei [2 ]
Dai, Bindong [1 ]
Cao, Jinya [1 ]
Wei, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Psychol Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Med Doctor Program 4 4, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
patients; clinicians; doctors; treatment expectation; personalized medicine; patient safety; doctor-patient relationship; treatment outcome; SURGERY PATIENTS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1447405
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Importance: Understanding treatment expectations of patients and their clinicians is of great importance in improving personalized medical services and enhancing patient safety systems. Objective: To investigate treatment expectations of patients and their clinicians and compare differences between both, by using a pair of validated structured assessment tools covering three key aspects/dimensions of clinical interests. Design, setting, and participants: This single-center cross-sectional study was conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China. The study enrolled patients aged 16 years and older receiving inpatient care and their clinicians. Patient recruitment was conducted from March 2023 to November 2023. Assessments: In addition to demographic and clinical characteristics, this study employed two validated structured assessment tools to evaluate treatment expectations among patients and their clinicians: the Hospitalized Patients' Expectations for Treatment Scale-Patient version (HOPE-P) and its counterpart, the Hospitalized Patients' Expectations for Treatment Scale-Clinician version (HOPE-C). Results: A total of 233 patients (mean [SD] age, 52.3 [15.1] years; 108 [46.4%] female) along with their clinicians, who numbered 75 in total were enrolled in this study. The distribution of total scores for HOPE-P and HOPE-C displayed similar patterns, with most scores concentrated in the higher range (above 50% of the full score). The mean HOPE-P total score was higher than that of HOPE-C (mean [SD] score, 38.78 [4.86] vs 37.49 [4.32]; t = 3.12, P = 0.002). In Dimension 2, the HOPE-P score was higher than HOPE-C (23.67 [3.20] vs 21.72 [3.03]; t = 6.98, P < 0.001). However, in Dimensions 1 and 3, HOPE-P scored lower than HOPE-C (13.37 [2.44] vs 13.84 [1.73]; t = -2.384, P < 0.018; 1.74 [1.14] vs 1.94 [1.00]; t = -2.00, P = 0.047). Certain demographic and clinical characteristics led to variations in patients' treatment expectations, including marital status, monthly family income, and smoking history. Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study revealed significant differences between patients' and doctors' treatment expectations. Notably, it highlighted the need for clinicians to focus on rationalizing patients' expectations concerning treatment outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Expectations of pain and functioning in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a cross-sectional study
    Sigrid Skatteboe
    Cecilie Røe
    Morten Wang Fagerland
    Lars-Petter Granan
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18
  • [2] Hope and illness expectations: A cross-sectional study in patients with advanced cancer
    Loucka, Martin
    Althouse, Andrew D.
    Arnold, Robert M.
    Smith, Thomas J.
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    White, Douglas B.
    Rosenzweig, Margaret Q.
    Schenker, Yael
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 38 (01) : 131 - 139
  • [3] Expectations of pain and functioning in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a cross-sectional study
    Skatteboe, Sigrid
    Roe, Cecilie
    Fagerland, Morten Wang
    Granan, Lars-Petter
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18
  • [4] Clinicians' attitudes towards escalation and management of deteriorating patients: A cross-sectional study
    Newman, Deb
    Hofstee, Fran
    Bowen, Karen
    Massey, Deb
    Penman, Olivia
    Aggar, Christina
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 36 (03) : 320 - 326
  • [5] Treatment of 5413 hypertensive patients: a cross-sectional study
    Paulsen, M. S.
    Sondergaard, J.
    Reuther, L.
    Larsen, P. S.
    Munck, A. P.
    Larsen, P. V.
    Damsgaard, J.
    Poulsen, L.
    Hansen, D. G.
    Jacobsen, I. A.
    Larsen, M. L.
    Christensen, H. R.
    Christensen, B.
    Andersen, M.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 28 (06) : 599 - 607
  • [6] Treatment adherence in hypertensive patients - a cross-sectional study
    Amaral, Odete
    Chaves, Claudia
    Duarte, Joao
    Coutinho, Emilia
    Nelas, Paula
    Preto, Olinda
    5TH ICEEPSY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 171 : 1288 - 1295
  • [7] Patients' Expectations of Healthcare Chaplaincy: A Cross-Sectional Study in the German Part of Switzerland
    Winter-Pfaendler, Urs
    Flannelly, Kevin J.
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2013, 52 (01): : 159 - 168
  • [8] A Cross-Sectional Study of Psychological Expectations of Orthognathic Surgery Patients Based on Their Typology
    Falinda, D.
    Tahim, A.
    Cronin, A.
    Komath, D.
    Pabla, R.
    Mistry, P.
    Lee, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [9] Raising positive expectations helps patients with minor ailments: A cross-sectional study
    Thijs Fassaert
    Sandra van Dulmen
    François Schellevis
    Liesbeth van der Jagt
    Jozien Bensing
    BMC Family Practice, 9
  • [10] Hope, bias and survival expectations of advanced cancer patients: A cross-sectional study
    Finkelstein, Eric A.
    Baid, Drishti
    Cheung, Yin Bun
    Schweitzer, Maurice E.
    Malhotra, Chetna
    Volpp, Kevin
    Kanesvaran, Ravindran
    Lee, Lai Heng
    Dent, Rebecca Alexandra
    Ng Chau Hsien, Matthew
    Bin Harunal Rashid, Mohamad Farid
    Somasundaram, Nagavali
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 (05) : 780 - 788