Optimizing LQR controllers: A comparative study

被引:3
|
作者
Chacko, Sanjay Joseph [1 ]
Neeraj, P. C. [2 ]
Abraham, Rajesh Joseph [3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Space Sci & Technol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Thiruvananthapuram 695547, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol Calicut, Dept Elect & Commun, Kozhikode 673601, India
[3] Indian Inst Space Sci & Technol, Dept Avion, Thiruvananthapuram 695547, India
来源
关键词
Artificial Bee Colony; Artificial Neural Network; Inverted pendulum; Newton-Raphson method; Optimal control; Optimisation; INVERTED PENDULUM SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rico.2024.100387
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Linear Quadratic Regulator is one of the most common ways to control a linear system. Despite Linear Quadratic Regulator's (LQR) strong performance and solid resilience, developing these controllers have been challenging, largely because there is no reliable way to choose the Q and R weighing matrices. In this regard a deterministic method is used for choosing them in this paper, providing the designers a precise control over performance variables. An Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) optimisation is also used to find the sub-optimal gain matrices along with an analytical approach based on neural networks. A comparative study of the three approaches is performed using MATLAB simulations. These three approaches are applied on an inverted pendulum-cart system due to its complexity and dexterity. The results show that all the three methods show comparable performances with the proposed analytical method being slightly better in terms of transient characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study of stabilizing control of a planer electromagnetic levitation using PID and LQR controllers
    Yaseen, Mundher H. A.
    RESULTS IN PHYSICS, 2017, 7 : 4379 - 4387
  • [2] Comparative Analysis of Performance of the SEPIC Converter Using LQR and PID Controllers
    Sel, Artun
    Gunes, Uvgar
    Elbir, Ovune
    Kasnakoglu, Cou
    2017 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM THEORY, CONTROL AND COMPUTING (ICSTCC), 2017, : 839 - 844
  • [3] Comparative Study of Optimal Multivariable LQR and MPC Controllers for Unmanned Combat Air Systems in Trajectory Tracking
    Ortiz, Alvaro
    Garcia-Nieto, Sergio
    Simarro, Raul
    ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (03) : 1 - 31
  • [4] Comparative Analysis of Iterative LQR and Adaptive PD Controllers for a Lower Limb Exoskeleton
    Sergey, Jatsun
    Sergei, Savin
    Andrey, Yatsun
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER TECHNOLOGY IN AUTOMATION, CONTROL, AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (CYBER), 2016, : 239 - 244
  • [5] The Power of Linear Controllers in LQR Control
    Goel, Gautam
    Hassibi, Babak
    2022 IEEE 61ST CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2022, : 6652 - 6657
  • [6] SDN Controllers: A Comparative Study
    Salman, Ola
    Elhajj, Imad H.
    Kayssi, Ayman
    Chehab, Ali
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH MEDITERRANEAN ELECTROTECHNICAL CONFERENCE MELECON 2016, 2016,
  • [7] POISSON LQR DESIGN FOR ASYNCHRONOUS MULTIRATE CONTROLLERS
    LELAND, RP
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1995, 40 (01) : 115 - 118
  • [8] A design method for stable fuzzy LQR controllers
    Concha, J
    Cipriano, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS I - III, 1997, : 271 - 276
  • [9] Deep Reinforcement Learning with Embedded LQR Controllers
    Caarls, Wouter
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02): : 8063 - 8069
  • [10] Sequential synthesis of PID controllers based on LQR method
    Hernandez-Osorio, M. A.
    Ochoa-Velasco, C. E.
    Garcia-Alvarado, M. A.
    Escobedo-Morales, A.
    Ruiz-Lopez, I. I.
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE INGENIERIA QUIMICA, 2020, 19 (02): : 913 - 928