Clinical research imperatives: principles and priorities from the perspective of Allied Health executives and managers

被引:1
|
作者
Hillier, Susan [1 ]
Lodge, Duncan [2 ,3 ]
Nolan, Jo [3 ,4 ]
Yandell, Rosalie [2 ,3 ]
Chur-Hansen, Anna [5 ]
George, Stacey [6 ]
Lynch, Elizabeth [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Allied Hlth & Human Performance, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] SA Hlth, Dept Hlth & Wellbeing, Adelaide, Australia
[3] SA Hlth, Southern Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Adelaide, Australia
[4] SA Hlth, Allied & Sci Hlth Off, Adelaide, Australia
[5] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, Australia
[6] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, Australia
关键词
allied health; health services research; models of care; mixed-methods; research priorities; research principles; patient outcomes; workforce;
D O I
10.1071/AH23262
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective It is widely understood that a key means of improving health systems and patient outcomes is through research - accessing, understanding, generating and applying research evidence-based practice. To promote more targeted and strategic research in Allied Health practice, this study sought to establish the principles, areas and priorities for clinical research as perceived by Allied Health leaders in the South Australian public health system.Methods The study used a mixed-methods design (full, sequential and equal model). Participants were recruited from the South Australian Department of Health and Wellbeing employment lists for Allied Health senior leaders. Consenting participants attended face-to-face focus groups; after an overview presentation, they discussed the principles for Allied Health research, followed by areas and priorities for research. Summaries of the responses were themed descriptively and circulated electronically so participants could confirm the research areas and ascribe priority ratings, clinical populations and services.Results A total of 28 people attended the stakeholder forum (5 online); 20 responded to the second-round electronic summary. Nine principles of research action were agreed. Fourteen research areas were identified and prioritised. There was a relatively consistent prioritisation of measuring Allied Health value, Allied Health workforce, hospital avoidance and closing the gap for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples health outcomes - whether the individuals were thinking about their own service or the state as a whole.Conclusions Allied Health leadership identified key principles and priorities for research to improve service delivery and patient outcomes. These priorities should generate further discussion and interest for novice and experienced researchers and leaders and can be used to inform granting and project plans. What is known about the topic? Allied Health are well equipped to engage in research but have limited capacity. What does this paper add? We have identified key priorities and principles to inform Allied Health research activity. What are the implications for practitioners? Practitioners, funders and other stakeholders can develop these identified principles and priorities to direct research time and resources for the most impact on health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 217
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges and Research Priorities for Dementia Care in Malaysia from the Perspective of Health and Allied Health Professionals
    Rosli, Roshaslina
    Goodson, Michaela
    Tan, Maw Pin
    Mohan, Devi
    Reidpath, Daniel
    Allotey, Pascal
    Kamaruzzaman, Shahrul
    Chin, Ai-Vyrn
    Robinson, Louise
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (21)
  • [2] A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers’ perspective
    Xanthe Golenko
    Susan Pager
    Libby Holden
    BMC Health Services Research, 12
  • [3] A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers' perspective
    Golenko, Xanthe
    Pager, Susan
    Holden, Libby
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 12
  • [4] Setting Research Priorities Within Allied Health: What Do Clinicians Think?
    Davis, Annette
    Lee, Den-Ching Angel
    Wenzel, Lisa-Anabell
    Haines, Terry
    INTERNET JOURNAL OF ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES AND PRACTICE, 2018, 17 (01):
  • [5] Challenges, uncertainties and perceived benefits of providing weekend allied health services—a managers’ perspective
    Deb Mitchell
    Lisa O’Brien
    Anne Bardoel
    Terry Haines
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [6] Priorities for research on environment, climate and health, a European perspective
    Elina Drakvik
    Manolis Kogevinas
    Åke Bergman
    Anais Devouge
    Robert Barouki
    Environmental Health, 21
  • [7] Setting priorities for dementia research: a global health perspective
    Albanese, E.
    Shah, H.
    Duggan, C.
    Langa, K.
    Snyder, H.
    Rudan, I.
    Dua, T.
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2015, 20 : 3 - 4
  • [8] Transdisciplinary research and clinical priorities for better health
    Fontana, Luigi
    Fasano, Alessio
    Chong, Yap Seng
    Vineis, Paolo
    Willett, Walter C.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (07)
  • [9] Diversity in clinical research: public health and social justice imperatives
    Varma, Tanvee
    Jones, Camara P.
    Oladele, Carol
    Miller, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 49 (03) : 200 - 203
  • [10] Promoting the Place of the Allied Health Professions in Clinical Research
    Rothan-Tondeur, Monique
    Courcier, Soizic
    Behier, Jehan-Michel
    Leblanc, Judith
    Peoch, Nadia
    Lefort, Marie-Claude
    Barthelemy, Philippe
    Bassompierre, Francois
    Bilbault, Pascal
    Deal, Cecile
    Diebolt, Vincent
    Fraleux, Michele
    Francois, Bruno
    Gambotti, Laetitia
    Levy-Marchal, Claire
    Misse, Christophe
    Roussel, Christophe
    Sibenaler, Claire
    Simon, Tabassome
    Tavernier, Blanche
    Thoby, Frederique
    THERAPIE, 2014, 69 (04): : 281 - 290