Exploring Corruption Factors Inhibiting Team Decision-Making on Construction Projects

被引:0
|
作者
Leung, Mei-yung [1 ]
Ojo, Lekan Damilola [1 ]
Ahmed, Khursheed [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Kowloon Tong, 80 Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Africa; Construction projects; Corruption; Team decision-making; BEHAVIORAL-FACTORS; ANTI-CORRUPTION; INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT; CULTURE; PROCUREMENT; CONTRACTS; COLLUSION; BUSINESS; BRIBERY;
D O I
10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5873
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Construction projects are actualized through the involvement of multidisciplinary stakeholders from various cultural and ethnic groups or nationalities who have different levels of exposure to civilization, languages, and world views. Their cultural diversity makes the evaluation of corruption a daunting task and subsequently can adversely affect the team decision-making process, disrupt collaboration among stakeholders, reduce project quality, and hinder outcomes of construction projects. The constant occurrence of building collapse, in which about 83% are linked to corruption, cost overrun, time overrun, and risk to lives in construction projects, often point at corrupt behaviors among construction stakeholders during decision-making, which remain unabated. Construction team members with a corrupt mindset may jeopardize the required standards, specifications, manipulate construction bid, inflate construction cost, distort information, and thorough supervision of projects. In fact, discouragement of foreign investors in the construction industry, which often affects the reputation of the industry, can further exacerbate if not curbed. Past studies mainly focused on forms of corruption in the construction industry, while understanding the factors that triggers them can lead to the practical recommendations for minimizing corruption. Therefore, this study used focus groups to explore corruption factors and the ways they inhibit team decision-making on construction projects in Africa. Hence, five focus groups of a total of 30 construction professionals were conducted virtually with consultants, contractors, government officials, developers, and clients in the Nigerian construction industry. The discourses in the focus groups were summarized and analyzed using contextual analysis. The participants identified 15 corruption factors that affected the team decision-making processes on construction projects, and those corruption influences were classified into four main types: (1) individual people's values (e.g., unity, tolerance, harmony, superiority, etc.); (2) project factors (project complexity and project secrecy); (3) organizational variables (organization-government alliances and unethical professionalism); and (4) societal factors (social pressures, social norms, and social ties). The study's findings build an understanding of the critically important corrupt actions that negatively influence construction projects. Even more importantly, the findings can be used to design public enlightenment campaigns against corruption and in favor of project monitoring. Practical recommendations are given, such as positive applications of human values, with utmost sincerity, to achieve the expected goals of team decision-making. The deliberate involvement of female construction professionals in project teams is also advised. In summary, the corruption factors that we investigated in this study form a basis for a future larger-scale study; meanwhile, the approach we employed is suitable for drawing necessary inferences. The bane of corruption in the construction industry is alarming, especially in developing countries. In this research, the factors of corruption affecting team decision-making on construction projects were explored in an interactive discourse among groups of construction stakeholders. For minimizing the corrupt actions and improving the completion of construction projects within cost, time, and quality, values of individual stakeholders and projects can be the fundamental components in the industry. Transparency in the construction team decision-making process must be ensured by making all contract information available to the public for monitoring and progress tracking. It is expected that corrupt actions as a result of alliances between construction organizations and government officials can then be uncovered and minimized. The construction institutions must also ensure that unethical professionalism among members is punished adequately without favor or prejudice, and every opportunity for corruption to thrive in the society must be discouraged.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DECISION-MAKING IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
    Dubrovin, V. I.
    Kolpakova, T. A.
    Kozlov, A. V.
    RADIO ELECTRONICS COMPUTER SCIENCE CONTROL, 2010, 1 : 134 - 141
  • [2] Delay in Decision-Making Affecting Construction Projects: A Sustainable Decision-Making Model for Mega Projects
    Khahro, Shabir Hussain
    Shaikh, Haseeb Haleem
    Zainun, Noor Yasmin
    Sultan, Basel
    Khahro, Qasim Hussain
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [3] Decisive factors for decision-making to achieving sustainable procurement in construction projects
    Osuizugbo, Innocent Chigozie
    Adenuga, Olumide Afolarin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUILDING PATHOLOGY AND ADAPTATION, 2022,
  • [4] A Decision-Making Framework for Subcontractor Selection in Construction Projects
    Abbasianjahromi, Hamidreza
    Sepehri, Mehran
    Abbasi, Omid
    ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 30 (02) : 141 - 152
  • [5] Exploring machine learning techniques to predict deforestation to enhance the decision-making of road construction projects
    Larrea-Gallegos, Gustavo
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 26 (01) : 225 - 239
  • [6] EVALUATIONS IN TEAM DECISION-MAKING
    FLORES, V
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1992, 24 (10): : 6 - 6
  • [7] DECISION-MAKING IN AN INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM
    CHASE, S
    WRIGHT, JH
    RAGADE, R
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1981, 26 (03): : 206 - 215
  • [8] THE SUPERIORITY OF TEAM DECISION-MAKING
    PFEIFFER, SI
    EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 1982, 49 (01) : 68 - 69
  • [9] Research on Decision-making Effectiveness Factors of Top Management Team
    Guo Ran
    Liu Bing
    Yang Zhan-li
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING - 18TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I AND II, 2011, : 348 - 354
  • [10] Exploring Decision-Making Methods in Lean Construction Tool Selection
    Turkyilmaz, Osman Hulusi
    Besiktepe, Deniz
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2024: CONTRACTING, DELIVERY, SCHEDULING, ESTIMATING, ECONOMICS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, : 382 - 392