4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel multi-generating cycle based on waste heat recovery from solid oxide fuel cell fed by biomass

被引:2
|
作者
Mishamandani, Arian Shabruhi [1 ]
Nejad, Amir Qatarani [1 ]
Shabani, Najmeh [2 ]
Ahmadi, Gholamreza [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Fac Mech & Energy Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Guilan, Text Dept, Rasht, Iran
关键词
Solid oxide fuel cell; Supercritical CO 2; Transcritical CO 2; Organic Rankine cycle; Reverse osmosis; Thermoelectric generator; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; ENERGY-PRODUCTION; POWER-GENERATION; EXERGOENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES; MULTIGENERATION SYSTEM; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DESALINATION SYSTEM; EXERGY ANALYSIS; BRAYTON CYCLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ref.2024.100610
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The present study optimizes a novel developed cycle including solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) fed by synthesis gas produced from biomass as well as gas turbine (GT), supercritical carbon dioxide cycle (SCO2), transcritical carbon dioxide cycle (TCO2), Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), thermoelectric generator (TEG), and reverse osmosis (RO)- based desalination. Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses on the developed cycle were investigated. Multi-objective optimization was carried out using of Genetic algorithm using generated power and exergy destruction as objective functions. Sankey diagram data indicate that afterburner holds the highest portion of the total exergy destruction 46.5% (692.24 kW), followed by SOFC which is 20.48% (304.51 kW). Moreover, optimization results showed that the total net power, first and second laws of thermodynamic efficiencies increased by 2.6%, 0.96% and 0.83%, respectively, while exergy destruction decreased by 1%. Furthermore, such a power increase (18.53 kW) using the freshwater produced by RO leads to daily production of 17040 liters of drinking water. According to the exergoeconomic analysis, the minimum flow value pertains to GT at a value of 0.0119 $/GJ, while the TCO2 turbine has the highest value which is 0.2867 $/GJ. The system product cost rate and exergy destruction cost rate reached 27.0353 $/h, and 10.7012 $/h, respectively. In the case of the exergoenvironmental one, the maximum environmental impact is related to the SCO2 turbine 0.0212 Pts/GJ, while SOFC has the lowest (0.0002 Pts/GJ). The system product environmental impact and exergy destruction were achieved at optimum values of 2.7503 $/h, and 4.1576 x10- 7 $/h, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 4E analysis and multi objective optimization of a micro gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell hybrid combined heat and power system
    Sanaye, Sepehr
    Katebi, Arash
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2014, 247 : 294 - 306
  • [2] 4E analyses and multi-objective optimization of cascade refrigeration cycles with heat recovery system
    Mofrad, Kamyar Golbaten
    Zandi, Sina
    Salehi, Gholamreza
    Manesh, Mohammad Hasan Khoshgoftar
    THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2020, 19
  • [3] 4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of a CCHP cycle based on gas turbine and ejector refrigeration
    Moghimi, Mahdi
    Emadi, Mohammadali
    Ahmadi, Pouria
    Moghadasi, Hesam
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 141 : 516 - 530
  • [4] Multi-objective optimization of sorption enhanced steam biomass gasification with solid oxide fuel cell
    Detchusananard, Thanaphorn
    Sharma, Shivom
    Marechal, Francois
    Arpornwichanop, Amornchai
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 182 : 412 - 429
  • [5] 4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of an integrated MCFC (molten carbonate fuel cell) and ORC (organic Rankine cycle) system
    Mamaghani, Alireza Haghighat
    Najafi, Behzad
    Shirazi, Alec
    Rinaldi, Fabio
    ENERGY, 2015, 82 : 650 - 663
  • [6] Multi-objective optimization of biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell integrated with Stirling engine and electrolyzer
    Habibollahzade, Ali
    Gholamian, Ehsan
    Houshfar, Ehsan
    Behzadi, Amirmohammad
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 171 : 1116 - 1133
  • [7] 4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of CCHP using MOPSOA
    Sanaye, Sepehr
    Hajabdollahi, Hassan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART E-JOURNAL OF PROCESS MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 228 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [8] Multi-objective bat optimization for a biomass gasifier integrated energy system based on 4E analyses
    Cao, Yan
    Dhahad, Hayder A.
    Farouk, Naeim
    Xia, Wei-Feng
    Rad, Hima Nikafshan
    Ghasemi, Amir
    Kamranfar, Saeed
    Sani, Mostafa Mostafavi
    Shayesteh, Ali Akbar
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 196
  • [9] Comparative 4E and advanced exergy analyses and multi-objective optimization of refrigeration cycles with a heat recovery system
    Mofrad, K. Golbaten
    Zandi, S.
    Salehi, G.
    Manesh, M. H. Khoshgoftar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMODYNAMICS, 2020, 23 (03) : 197 - 214
  • [10] Multi-objective optimization of a continuous thermally regenerative electrochemical cycle for waste heat recovery
    Long, Rui
    Li, Baode
    Liu, Zhichun
    Liu, Wei
    ENERGY, 2015, 93 : 1022 - 1029