Automated lattice radiation therapy treatment planning personalised to tumour size and shape

被引:1
|
作者
Gaudreault, Mathieu [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Kelvin K. [3 ,4 ]
Chang, David [2 ,3 ]
Kron, Tomas [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Hardcastle, Nicholas [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Chander, Sarat [2 ,3 ]
Yeo, Adam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Phys Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Oncol, Sir Peter MacCallum, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[3] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[4] Univ Santo Tomas Hosp, Benavides Canc Inst, Manila, Philippines
[5] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 125卷
关键词
LRT; SFRT; Sarcoma; ESAPI; GRID THERAPY; LUNG-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104490
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) alternates regions of high and low doses inside the tumour. Whilst this technique reported positive results in tumour size reduction, optimal lattice parameters are still unknown. We introduce an automated LRT planning method personalised to tumour shape and designed to allow investigation of lattice geometry. Methods: Patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma were considered for inclusion. Automation was performed with the Eclipse Scripting Application Interface (v16, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto). By iterating over vertex size (V) and centre-to-centre distance (D), vertices were segmented within the gross tumour volume (GTV) in an alternating square pattern. Iterations stopped when the number of inserted vertices was contained between a prespecified lower and upper bound. Forty sets of lattices were considered, produced by varying V and D in five lower/upper bound pairs. Best-scoring sets were determined with a score favouring the maximization of GTV dose uniformity and heterogeneity whilst minimizing the maximum dose to organs at risk. Results: Fifty patients with tumour volumes between 150 cm(3) and 10,000 cm(3) were included. Best-scoring sets were characterised by a low number of vertices (<15). Based on the best-scoring set, the predicted parameters to use for new patients were V = 0.19 (GTV volume)(1/3) and D = 2V, in centimetres. The number of vertices (N) to insert in the GTV can be estimated with N <= (24 x 3% GTV volume)/(4 pi V-3). Conclusions: The automated LRT treatment planning personalised to tumour size allows investigation of lattice geometry over a large range of GTV volumes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of an automated treatment planning approach for lattice radiation therapy
    Gaudreault, Mathieu
    Chang, David
    Kron, Tomas
    Siva, Shankar
    Chander, Sarat
    Hardcastle, Nicholas
    Yeo, Adam
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (01) : 682 - 693
  • [2] Fully automated noncoplanar radiation therapy treatment planning
    Huang, Charles
    Yang, Yong
    Xing, Lei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (11) : 7439 - 7449
  • [3] Personalised radiation therapy taking both the tumour and patient into consideration
    Overgaard, Jens
    Aznar, Marianne C.
    Bacchus, Carol
    Coppes, Rob P.
    Deutsch, Eric
    Georg, Dietmar
    Haustermans, Karin
    Hoskin, Peter
    Krause, Mechthild
    Lartigau, Eric F.
    Lee, Anne W. M.
    Loeck, Steffen
    Offersen, Birgitte V.
    Thwaites, David I.
    van der Kogel, Albert J.
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Baumann, Michael
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 : A1 - A5
  • [4] Meta-optimization for fully automated radiation therapy treatment planning
    Huang, Charles
    Nomura, Yusuke
    Yang, Yong
    Xing, Lei
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (05):
  • [5] Validation of Automated Segmentation Algorithms for Clinical Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning
    Watkins, W.
    Du, D.
    Qing, K.
    Liu, J.
    Ladbury, C.
    Liu, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [6] API Based Automated Treatment Planning of Lung Stereotactic Radiation Therapy
    Dise, J.
    Schmidt, M.
    Szentivanyi, P.
    Reynoso, F.
    Pryser, E.
    Abraham, C.
    Knutson, N.
    Hugo, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [7] Automated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Using Meta-Optimization
    Huang, C.
    Nomura, Y.
    Yang, Y.
    Xing, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E583 - E584
  • [8] Automated Lattice Treatment Planning for Bulky Tumors
    Kumar, N.
    Takiar, V.
    Nelson, B.
    Frankart, A. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E664 - E665
  • [9] Validation of an automated contouring and treatment planning tool for pediatric craniospinal radiation therapy
    Hernandez, Soleil
    Burger, Hester
    Nguyen, Callistus
    Paulino, Arnold C.
    Lucas, John T.
    Faught, Austin M.
    Duryea, Jack
    Netherton, Tucker
    Rhee, Dong Joo
    Cardenas, Carlos
    Howell, Rebecca
    Fuentes, David
    Pollard-Larkin, Julianne
    Court, Laurence
    Parkes, Jeannette
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [10] Treatment Planning for Radiation Therapy
    MacManus, Michael
    Everitt, Sarah
    PET CLINICS, 2018, 13 (01) : 43 - +