Reliability and validity of the German version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Podzimek, Jiri [1 ]
Jecker, Peter [1 ]
Koscielny, Sven [2 ]
Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando [2 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Bad Salzungen GmbH, Klin HNO & Plast Kopf Hals Chirurg, Lindigallee 3, D-36433 Bad Salzungen, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Jena, HNO, Jena, Germany
关键词
Globus; Fragebogen; Reliabilit & auml; t; Validit & auml; Reflux; globus; questionnaire; reliability; validity; reflux; GLOBUS PHARYNGEUS; DIAGNOSIS; ETIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1055/a-2362-0465
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background Many patients who consult the ENT doctor suffer from globus sensation, as a term for a multifactorial symptom description. It is particularly important during initial consultation to take the often-sensitive patients seriously and to offer a structured diagnostic clarification. Today, there is a lack of a screening tool in everyday clinical practice that can be used to differentiate the globus sensations more closely and assess their severity Objectives The reliability and validity of the German version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS) were examined. Materials und Methods The original GETS questionnaire was translated into German (GETS-G) and completed by 60 patients with globus sensation (>3 months) in a prospective observational study. All patients received a clinical examination a sonography of the neck. In patients without an identifiable organic cause, a pH monitoring was carried out. Results A local organic cause for the globus sensation was found in 30 patients (50%). In addition, reflux was detected in 24 patients (40%) using pH monitoring. No cause could be determined in only 6 patients (10%). According to the overall score (Q1-Q12), there was no significant difference between these three groups. The Cronbach's alpha for assessing reliability was 0.88 in the 12-item analysis. Principal component analysis yielded a globus scale, dysphagia scale and a chronic pharyngeal irritation scale. Conclusions The GETS-G showed high reliability and validity, which justifies its use in patients with globus sensation in German-speaking countries and may lead to a better assessment of the severity of this symptom.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS-J): Use for a symptom scale of globus sensation
    Takahashi, Nao
    Mori, Kaori
    Baba, Hironori
    Sasaki, Takanobu
    Ohno, Masaaki
    Ikarashi, Fumio
    Aizawa, Naotaka
    Sato, Kunihiro
    Tsuchiya, Akio
    Hanazawa, Hideyuki
    Tomita, Masahiko
    Kubota, Yamato
    Morita, Yuka
    Takahashi, Kuniyuki
    Horii, Arata
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2018, 45 (05) : 1041 - 1046
  • [2] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale: Use for a Symptom Scale of Globus Sensation in Turkish Population
    Korkmaz, Muge Ozcelik
    Tuzuner, Arzu
    Bahcecitapar, Melike
    Karacaer, Cengiz
    TURKISH ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 58 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS-J): use for a symptom scale of globus sensation (vol 45, pg 1041, 2018)
    Takahashi, Nao
    Mori, Kaori
    Baba, Hironori
    Sasaki, Takanobu
    Ohno, Masaaki
    Ikarashi, Fumio
    Aizawa, Naotaka
    Sato, Kunihiro
    Tsuchiya, Akio
    Hanazawa, Hideyuki
    Tomita, Masahiko
    Kubota, Yamato
    Morita, Yuka
    Takahashi, Kuniyuki
    Horii, Arata
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2019, 46 (04) : 651 - 652
  • [4] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale
    Uygur, Omer Faruk
    Uygur, Hilal
    Chung, Seockhoon
    Ahmed, Oli
    Demiroz, Dudu
    Aydin, Esat Fahri
    Hursitoglu, Onur
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2022, 98 : 144 - 151
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the German version of the OPTION scale
    Hirsch, Oliver
    Keller, Heidemarie
    Mueller-Engelmann, Meike
    Gutenbrunner, Monika Heinzel
    Krones, Tanja
    Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2012, 15 (04) : 379 - 388
  • [6] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Glasgow antipsychotic side effect scale
    Aslan, Esma Akpinar
    Batmaz, Sedat
    Yuncu, Ozgur Ahmet
    Sevil, Neslihan
    Erkek, Burcu
    KLINIK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 23 (03): : 290 - 301
  • [7] Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for Fathers of Newborns
    Jen, Wei-Hsuan
    Hung, Tai-Ho
    Chen, Ching-Yen
    Tsai, Yun-Fang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2022, 16 (06)
  • [8] Examining the reliability and validity of the arabic version of the Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale (GSES)
    Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed Abdullah
    Abu-Saleh, Salma Yasser
    Almohaya, Yara Abdullah
    Alamri, Hind Khayran
    Ghazzawi, Hadeel
    Trabelsi, Khaled
    Saif, Zahra
    BaHammam, Ahmed S.
    Pandi-Perumal, Seithikurippu R.
    Jahrami, Haitham
    SLEEP AND BREATHING, 2024, 28 (04) : 1831 - 1838
  • [9] Validity and reliability of a German version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
    Gauggel, S
    Birkner, B
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE-FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 1999, 28 (01): : 18 - 27
  • [10] The German version of the Individualized Care Scale - assessing validity and reliability
    Koeberich, Stefan
    Suhonen, Riitta
    Feuchtinger, Johanna
    Farin, Erik
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2015, 9 : 483 - 494