Clinical Decision Support as a Prevention Tool for Medication Errors in the Operating Room: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

被引:0
|
作者
Amici, Lynda D. [1 ]
van Pelt, Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mylott, Laura [1 ]
Langlieb, Marin [2 ]
Nanji, Karen C. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Nursing, Boston, MA USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Boston, MA USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Anesthesia, Boston, MA USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2024年 / 139卷 / 04期
关键词
ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; ORDER ENTRY; TECHNOLOGY; SAFETY; IMPACT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000007058
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Medication errors in the operating room have high potential for patient harm. While electronic clinical decision support (CDS) software has been effective in preventing medication errors in many nonoperating room patient care areas, it is not yet widely used in operating rooms. The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of self-reported intraoperative medication errors that could be prevented by CDS algorithms. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we obtained safety reports involving medication errors documented by anesthesia clinicians between August 2020 and August 2022 at a 1046-bed tertiary care academic medical center. Reviewers classified each medication error by its stage in the medication use process, error type, presence of an adverse medication event, and its associated severity and preventability by CDS. Informational gaps were corroborated by retrospective chart review and disagreements between reviewers were resolved by consensus. The primary outcome was the percentage of errors that were preventable by CDS. Secondary outcomes were preventability by CDS stratified by medication error type and severity. RESULTS: We received 127 safety reports involving 80 medication errors, and 76/80 (95%) of the errors were classified as preventable by CDS. Certain error types were more likely to be preventable by CDS than others (P < .001). The most likely error types to be preventable by CDS were wrong medication (N = 36, 100% rated as preventable), wrong dose (N = 30, 100% rated as preventable), and documentation errors (N = 3, 100% rated as preventable). The least likely error type to be preventable by CDS was inadvertent bolus (N = 3, none rated as preventable). CONCLUSIONS: Ninety-five percent of self-reported medication errors in the operating room were classified as preventable by CDS. Future research should include a randomized controlled trial to assess medication error rates and types with and without the use of CDS.
引用
收藏
页码:832 / 839
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hospital medication errors: a cross-sectional study
    Isaacs, Anton N.
    Ch'ng, Kenneth
    Delhiwale, Naaz
    Taylor, Kieran
    Kent, Bethany
    Raymond, Anita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 33 (01)
  • [2] Perceptions of Clinical Nurses About the Causes of Medication Administration Errors: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Cetin, Songul Biskin
    Cebeci, Fatma
    FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2021, 29 (01): : 56 - 64
  • [3] Perceptions on music and noise in the operating room: a cross-sectional study
    Hamad, Fadi
    Moacdieh, Nadine Marie
    Banat, Rim
    Lakissian, Zavi
    Al-Qaisi, Saif
    Zaytoun, George
    Sharara-Chami, Rana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2022, 28 (04) : 2168 - 2172
  • [4] Cross-sectional evaluation of a clinical decision support tool to identify medication-related problems at discharge from the acute care setting
    Dicristina, Savanna
    Turgeon, Jacques
    Michaud, Veronique
    Brunetti, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 7 (08): : 763 - 771
  • [5] Anticoagulant medication errors in hospitals and primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Dreijer, Albert R.
    Diepstraten, Jeroen
    Bukkems, Vera E.
    Mol, Peter G. M.
    Leebeek, Frank W. G.
    Kruip, Marieke J. H. A.
    van den Bemt, Patricia M. L. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 31 (05) : 346 - 352
  • [6] Operating Room Nurses? Knowledge of and Attitudes About Pressure Injury Prevention: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study
    Kandemir, Didem
    Ozhanli, Yasemin
    Erdogan, Hatice
    Temiz, Zeynep
    WOUND MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION, 2022, 68 (12) : 10 - 19
  • [7] Productivity of operating room from viewpoint operating room nurses in Iran: A national cross-sectional study
    Fereidouni, Armin
    Ghanavati, Maryam
    Shahkarami, Negar
    Maleki, Zahra
    Teymoori, Esmaeil
    PERIOPERATIVE CARE AND OPERATING ROOM MANAGEMENT, 2024, 35
  • [8] Medication knowledge, certainty, and risk of errors in health care: a cross-sectional study
    Bjoerg O Simonsen
    Inger Johansson
    Gro K Daehlin
    Lene Merete Osvik
    Per G Farup
    BMC Health Services Research, 11
  • [9] Medication knowledge, certainty, and risk of errors in health care: a cross-sectional study
    Simonsen, Bjoerg O.
    Johansson, Inger
    Daehlin, Gro K.
    Osvik, Lene Merete
    Farup, Per G.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 11
  • [10] Contamination of equipment and surfaces in the operating room anesthesia workspace: a cross-sectional study
    Macedo, Carlos Eduardo
    Ferreira, Adriano Menis
    Barcelos, Larissa da Silva
    Alvim, Andre Luiz Silva
    Carneiro, Liliane Moretti
    Martins, Sandro Rogerio
    de Andrade, Denise
    Rigotti, Marcelo Alessandro
    Gasques, Ruberval Peres
    da Silva Junior, Vanderlei Amaro
    de Oliveira, Layze Braz
    de Carvalho, Herica Emilia Felix
    de Sousa, Alvaro Francisco Lopes
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 142 (04):