Evidence based clinical practice guideline for follow-up care in persons with spinal cord injury

被引:0
|
作者
Eriks-Hoogland, Inge [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mueller, Lorena [3 ]
Baumberger, Michael [1 ]
Huber, Burkhart [4 ]
Michel, Franz [5 ]
Belfrage, Celina [1 ]
Elmerghini, Hicham [1 ]
Veseli-Abazi, Mide [1 ]
Boethig, Ralf [6 ]
Fiebag, Kai [6 ]
Thietje, Roland [6 ]
Jordan, Xavier [7 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Parapleg Ctr, Dept Paraplegiol, Nottwil, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lucerne, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Luzern, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Parapleg Res, Dept Hlth Serv & Clin Care, Nottwil, Switzerland
[4] AUVA Rehabil Ctr, Dept Traumatol, Haring, Austria
[5] REHAB Basel, Dept Paraplegiol, Basel, Switzerland
[6] BG Trauma Hosp Hamburg, Ctr Spinal Injuries, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Clin Romande Readaptat, Dept Paraplegiol, Sion, Switzerland
来源
关键词
spinal cord injury; spinal cord disease; spina bifida; lifelong follow-up care; prevention; outpatient care; guideline; MORTALITY; HEALTH; MORBIDITY; SURVIVAL; DEATH; CLASSIFICATION; COMMUNITY; LIFE; SETS;
D O I
10.3389/fresc.2024.1371556
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction While it is well-established that follow-up care programs play a crucial role in preventing and early detecting secondary health conditions (SHCs) in persons with spinal cord injury [SCI, including spina bifida (SB)], the availability of evidence-based follow-up care programs remains limited. Under the leadership of the German-speaking Medical Society for Paraplegiology (DMGP), we have developed an evidence based clinical practice guideline for follow-up care of SHCs in persons with SCI and identify research gaps.Methods This guideline was developed in accordance with the regulations of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF e.V.). To ensure an evidence-based guidance, we utilized the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) generic core set and ICF Core Set for individuals with SCI in long-term context as our foundational framework. We conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify existing recommendations for follow-up care and graded the level of evidence according to relevant instruments. Subsequently, we formulated recommendations and achieved consensus through a structured nominal group process involving defined steps and neutral moderation, while adhering to the criteria outlined in the German guideline development instrument (DELBI).Results Although there is a fair number of literatures describing prevalence and severity of SHCs after SCI, the amount of literature including recommendations was low (19 for SCI and 6 for SB). Based on the current evidence on prevalence and severity of SHCs and available recommendations, a clinical practice guideline on follow-up care of most relevant SHCs was defined. The recommendations for follow-up care are described in the following chapters: (1) Nervous system; (2) (Neuropathic) pain; (3) Cardiovascular diseases; (4) Respiratory System; (5) Immunological system, vaccination and allergies; (6) Gastrointestinal tract and function; (7) Endocrinological system and nutrition; (8) Urogenital system; (9) Contraception, pregnancy, birth and postpartum care; (10) Musculoskeletal system; (11) Pressure injuries; (12) Psychological health; (13) Medication and polypharmacy.Conclusion We could successfully establish an evidence based clinical practice guideline for follow-up care of SHCs in individuals with SCI. There is however a notable lack of high-quality recommendations for SCI follow-up care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidence based clinical practice guideline for follow-up care after spinal cord injury
    Hoogland, Eriks, I
    Baumberger, M.
    Jordan, X.
    Mueller, L.
    Thietje, R.
    Huber, B.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2022, 152 : 12S - 12S
  • [2] Predicting compliance with annual follow-up evaluations in persons with spinal cord injury
    Canupp, KC
    Waites, KB
    DeVivo, MJ
    Richards, JS
    SPINAL CORD, 1997, 35 (05) : 314 - 319
  • [3] Follow-up care for persons with spinal cord injury living in the community: a systematic review of interventions and their evaluation
    Bloemen-Vrencken, JHA
    de Witte, LP
    Post, MWM
    SPINAL CORD, 2005, 43 (08) : 462 - 475
  • [4] Predicting compliance with annual follow-up evaluations in persons with spinal cord injury
    Kay C Canupp
    Ken B Waites
    Michael J DeVivo
    J Scott Richards
    Spinal Cord, 1997, 35 : 314 - 319
  • [5] Follow-up care for persons with spinal cord injury living in the community: a systematic review of interventions and their evaluation
    J H A Bloemen-Vrencken
    L P de Witte
    M W M Post
    Spinal Cord, 2005, 43 : 462 - 475
  • [6] A multicentre follow-up of clinical aspects of traumatic spinal cord injury
    Pagliacci, M. C.
    Franceschini, M.
    Di Clemente, B.
    Agosti, M.
    Spizzichino, L.
    SPINAL CORD, 2007, 45 (06) : 404 - 410
  • [7] A multicentre follow-up of clinical aspects of traumatic spinal cord injury
    M C Pagliacci
    M Franceschini
    B Di Clemente
    M Agosti
    L Spizzichino
    Spinal Cord, 2007, 45 : 404 - 410
  • [8] Long-term follow-up of persons with spinal cord injury integrated in the community
    Martin, Priya
    Cherian, Binu
    John, Judy
    Tharion, George
    Bhattacharjee, Suranjan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 17 (02): : 76 - 82
  • [9] Follow-up for cervical cancer: a Program in Evidence-Based Care systematic review and clinical practice guideline update
    Elit, L.
    Kennedy, E. B.
    Fyles, A.
    Metser, U.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (02) : 109 - 118
  • [10] Survival in Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Receiving Structured Follow-Up in South India
    Barman, Apurba
    Shanmugasundaram, Devika
    Bhide, Rohit
    Viswanathan, Anand
    Magimairaj, Henry Prakash
    Nagarajan, Guru
    Arumugam, Elango
    Tharion, George
    Thomas, Raji
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (04): : 642 - 648