The role of electrification and the power sector in U.S. carbon neutrality

被引:1
|
作者
O'Keefe, Kowan T. V. [1 ]
Iyer, Gokul [1 ,2 ]
Kennedy, Kathleen M. [1 ]
Ou, Yang [3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Alicia [1 ]
Cui, Ryna [1 ]
McJeon, Haewon [5 ]
Hultman, Nathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Global Sustainabil, Sch Publ Policy, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Joint Global Change Res Inst, College Pk, MD USA
[3] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Green Growth & Sustainabil, Daejeon, South Korea
来源
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Climate policy; Energy transition pathways; Decarbonization; Electrification;
D O I
10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100155
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The United States has pledged to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. We examine a series of net-zero CO2 scenarios to investigate the impact of advanced electrification of end-use sectors on the dynamics of America's net-zero transition through 2050. Specifically, we use an integrated assessment model, GCAM-USA, to explore how advanced electrification can influence the evolution of the electricity system in pursuit of net-zero. State-level resolution for end-use demand sectors and energy transformation is a key feature of GCAM-USA that allows for elucidation of the variation in end-use electrification across states. All scenarios in this study are designed to be consistent with the modeling protocol for the Energy Modeling Forum Study 37 model inter-comparison project. Our scenarios show the scale of transformation in the power sector with average annual capacity additions reaching 121-143 GW/year and 172-190 GW/year in 2050 net-zero CO2 scenarios and 2045 net-zero CO2 scenarios, respectively, in the 2040s - approximately three to five times the 2021-2023 average. In 2050 net-zero CO2 scenarios, electrification rates in 2050 range from 15-48 % for transportation, 65-83 % for buildings, and 20-38 % for industry. If net-zero CO2 is achieved in 2045, transportation, buildings, and industry are 27-53 %, 78-84 %, and 41-53 % electrified by 2050, respectively. Advanced electrification of end-use sectors can reduce the magnitude of reliance on negative emissions by driving down residual positive emissions by mid-century. Altogether, our results demonstrate that a net-zero transition in the United States will require deep and rapid structural changes to the energy system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strategies for achieving carbon neutrality in the U.S.
    Canter, Neil
    Tribology and Lubrication Technology, 2021, 77 (05): : 16 - 17
  • [2] High electrification futures: Impacts to the U.S. bulk power system
    Murphy C.
    Mai T.
    Sun Y.
    Jadun P.
    Donohoo-Vallett P.
    Muratori M.
    Jones R.
    Nelson B.
    Electricity Journal, 2020, 33 (10):
  • [3] The politics of climate: Does factionalism impede U.S. carbon neutrality?
    Qin, Meng
    Su, Yun Hsuan
    Zhao, Zhengtang
    Mirza, Nawazish
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 78 : 954 - 966
  • [4] Wither U.S. Net Neutrality Regulation?
    Michael L. Katz
    Review of Industrial Organization, 2017, 50 : 441 - 468
  • [5] THE ROLE OF BORDER CARBON ADJUSTMENTS IN A U.S. CARBON TAX
    McKibbin, Warwick J.
    Morris, Adele C.
    Wilcoxen, Peter J.
    Liu, Weifeng
    CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2018, 9 (01)
  • [6] Restructuring the U.S. Electric Power Sector: A Review of Recent Studies
    John Kwoka
    Review of Industrial Organization, 2008, 32 : 165 - 196
  • [7] Innovation in the U.S. service sector
    Gallaher M.P.
    Petrusa J.E.
    Journal of Technology Transfer, 2006, 31 (06): : 611 - 628
  • [9] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE U.S. ECONOMY AND CONSUMER SPENDING IN THE U.S. CASINO SECTOR
    Sobel, Russell S.
    Walker, Douglas M.
    Meister, Alan P.
    GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2024, 28 (01): : 8 - 27
  • [10] Vicissitudes of U.S. Power
    Shi Yinhong is Professor of the Institute of International Relations
    ContemporaryInternationalRelations, 2006, (10) : 21 - 25