External oblique intercostal plane block versus subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for pain control in supraumbilical surgeries: a randomised controlled clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Amin, S. R. [1 ]
Khedr, A. N. [1 ]
Elhadad, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Benha Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia, Banha, Egypt
关键词
abdominal incisions; external oblique; TAP block; postoperative; analgesia; nerve blocks;
D O I
10.36303/SAJAA.3134
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) was designed to provide upper median and lateral abdominal wall analgesia. Its efficacy was mainly explored in case reports and retrospective studies. Our study aimed to prospectively assess EOIB efficacy in open supraumbilical procedures compared to subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blockade for pain control in the first 24 postoperative hours. Methods: A total of 63 adult patients scheduled for variable upper abdominal procedures involving supraumbilical incision were allocated randomly to three groups (21 each). After induction of general anaesthesia, patients received either EOIB (group E), subcostal TAP block (group T), or no block (group C). The primary study outcome was morphine consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative fentanyl supplements, haemodynamic variables, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, the occurrence of complications, and patient satisfaction. Results: The 24-hour postoperative morphine consumption and time to first rescue analgesia were significantly lower and longer, respectively, in the EOIB and subcostal TAP groups compared to the control group (p < 0.001) without significant differences between the intervention groups. VAS scores at rest and during cough were significantly higher in the control group than in the intervention groups. However, EOIB achieved less intraoperative fentanyl requirements than subcostal TAP (p = 0.04), with better haemodynamic stability and longer control of pain than the control group. Conclusion: The EOIB is as effective as subcostal TAP in delivering optimal analgesia and reducing perioperative opioid requirements. Considering the intraoperative advantages of EOIB in terms of lower fentanyl needs and better haemodynamic control, the EOIB is an attractive substitute for postoperative pain reduction following open upper abdominal surgeries
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 117
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Upper Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomised Clinical Study
    Rajitha, A.
    Kandukuru, Krishna Chaithanya
    Williams, Angela Ishwarya
    Deepthi, Griddaluru S.
    Devaram, Vijetha
    Aarumulla, Shiny Priyadarshini
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 18 (09) : UC17 - UC22
  • [2] Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block
    O'Connor, K.
    Renfrew, C.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (01) : 91 - 92
  • [3] Is a Combination of the Serratus Intercostal Plane Block and Rectus Sheath Block Superior to the Bilateral Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?
    Selvi, Onur
    Tulgar, Serkan
    Senturk, Ozgur
    Serifsoy, Talat Ercan
    Thomas, David Terence
    Deveci, Ugur
    Ozer, Zeliha
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 52 (01): : 34 - 37
  • [4] Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for epigastric cardiac pacemaker operation: A randomised controlled trial
    Kim, Jin-Tae
    Min, Jooncheol
    Park, Jung-Bin
    Jang, Young-Eun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 42 (03) : 275 - 278
  • [5] Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study
    Shrey, Shruti
    Sinha, Chandni
    Kumar, Abhyuday
    Kumar, Ajeet
    Kumar, Amarjeet
    Nambiar, Sreehari
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (11) : 965 - 970
  • [6] USE OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS ADJUVANT IN OBLIQUE SUBCOSTAL TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK
    Bisht, Swati
    Sreeramalu, Sunitha Kuruvadi
    Sadanand, Gopal
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (02): : 106 - 108
  • [7] Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block versus oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised single-blind trial
    Huang, Lvdan
    Zheng, Liangyu
    Zhang, Jingxiong
    Zhu, Xiaona
    Pan, Linmin
    Zhang, Yujian
    Wang, Quanguang
    Shi, Kejian
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [8] Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Pain After Caesarean Delivery: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Yorukoglu, Hadi Ufuk
    Sahin, Tulay
    Kula, Ayse Oge
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2023, 51 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [9] Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia
    Li, Kai
    Liu, Rui-zhu
    Chen, Lu
    Zhao, Guo-qing
    Cao, Rang-juan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, : 258 - 265
  • [10] Assessing pain outcome: is oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block better than other techiques?
    Ting, C. -K.
    Chen, P. -T.
    Mandell, M. Susan
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2014, 80 (02) : 146 - 148