Rifaximin alone vs combination with norfloxacin for secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis with hepatic encephalopathy: randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Gupta, Tarana [1 ]
Gaur, Vaibhav [1 ]
Saini, Anjali [1 ]
Jarpula, Nikhil Sai [1 ]
Goyal, Sandeep Kumar
机构
[1] Pt BD Sharma Postgrad Inst Med Sci, Dept Med, Rohtak, Haryana, India
关键词
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; Hepatic encephalopathy; Rifaximin; Norfloxacin; Cirrhosis; Gut dysbiosis; CHRONIC LIVER-FAILURE; CIRRHOSIS; DYSFUNCTION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s43066-024-00374-z
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn liver cirrhosis, events of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) portend a poor prognosis. Gut dysbiosis remains a common pathogenetic mechanism for both SBP and HE. Recent data suggests the role of rifaximin in gut modulation and improving intestinal dysbiosis. Due to emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, gut-selective antibiotics with minimal systemic effects are warranted for secondary prophylaxis in patients of cirrhosis. We compared rifaximin alone vs combination with norfloxacin for secondary prophylaxis of patients of cirrhosis presenting with SBP and HE. This was a prospective, open-label, RCT which included all patients of cirrhosis with SBP and HE on admission. On discharge, in addition to standard medical treatment, patients were randomized to rifaximin 400 mg three times a day (group I) and rifaximin 400 mg three times a day with norfloxacin 400 mg once a day (group II) as a secondary prophylaxis of SBP. Primary outcomes were recurrent episodes of SBP and HE at 6 months and 28-day, 90-day, and 6-month mortalities. Secondary outcomes included number of rehospitalizations, episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleed, new acute kidney injury episodes, and change in Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores over next 6 months.ResultsAfter screening 87 patients of cirrhosis with SBP and HE, 12 patients had in-hospital mortality and another 25 were excluded, one patient was lost to follow-up, and, finally, 49 patients were randomized into group I (n = 24) and group II (n = 25). The HE was grade 2 (18 vs 16) and grade 3 (6 vs 9) in groups I and II respectively. Primary outcomes as recurrent SBP (3 vs 2; P = 0.67); recurrent HE at 6 months (5 vs 2; P = 0.24); and 28-day (2 vs 2; P = 1.0) and 90-day mortality (4 vs 3; P = 0.72) and 6-month mortality (6 vs 8, P = 0.52) were comparable between two groups respectively. Secondary outcomes as number of rehospitalizations (3 vs 8, P = 0.07), new episodes of UGI bleed (2 vs 3, P = 0.1), new AKI episodes (4 vs 1, P = 0.06), triangle CTP (- 4 vs - 4), and triangle MELD (- 9 vs - 8) over the next 6 months were not significantly different between two groups respectively.ConclusionsRifaximin was effective in secondary prevention of both SBP and HE in patients of cirrhosis.Trial registrationThe randomized controlled trial was registered in CTRI/2021/09/036321 dated September 7, 2021.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RIFAXIMIN ALONE VERSUS COMBINATION WITH NORFLOXACIN FOR SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS OF SPONTANEOUS BACTERIAL PERITONITIS WITH HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY: A RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Gupta, Tarana
    Gaur, Vaibhav, Jr.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 74 : 1232A - 1232A
  • [2] Rifaximin Vs. Norfloxacin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Prophylaxis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Praharaj, Dibya L.
    Premkumar, Madhumita
    Roy, Akash
    Verma, Nipun
    Taneja, Sunil
    Duseja, Ajay
    Dhiman, Radha K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 12 (02) : 336 - 342
  • [3] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF RIFAXIMIN VERSUS NORFLOXACIN FOR SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS OF SPONTANEOUS BACTERIAL PERITONITIS
    Abd-Elsalam, S.
    Ali, L. A.
    Soliman, S.
    Ibrahim, S.
    Elfert, A.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 64 : S211 - S211
  • [4] Randomized-controlled trial of rifaximin versus norfloxacin for secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
    Elfert, Asem
    Abo Ali, Lobna
    Soliman, Samah
    Ibrahim, Shimaa
    Abd-Elsalam, Sherief
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 28 (12) : 1450 - 1454
  • [5] Norfloxacin versus rifaximin for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis prophylaxis: A randomized controlled trial
    Pala, Sanbanki
    Doke, Purwa
    Maindad, Dadasaheb
    JOURNAL OF KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY, 2024, 13 (01) : 112 - 122
  • [6] Norfloxacin with itopride versus norfloxacin alone in secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a randomized trial
    Afaf Y. M. Younes
    Sherief Abd-Elsalam
    Gehan F. Attia
    Mona A. H. Shehata
    Egyptian Liver Journal, 11
  • [7] Norfloxacin with itopride versus norfloxacin alone in secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a randomized trial
    Younes, Afaf Y. M.
    Abd-Elsalam, Sherief
    Attia, Gehan F.
    Shehata, Mona A. H.
    EGYPTIAN LIVER JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [8] Rifaximin plus norfloxacin versus norfloxacin alone in primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with variceal bleeding
    Ahmed A. Ghafar
    Salah Rozaik
    Ahmed Akef
    The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine, 2019, 31 (3) : 281 - 287
  • [9] Use of Rifaximin vs Norfloxacin for Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) - a Meta-analysis
    Sidhu, Gurpartap
    Go, Andrew
    Buttar, Rupinder
    Mohananey, Divyanshu
    Gill, Jasneet
    Attar, Bashar M.
    Go, Benjamin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S450 - S451
  • [10] Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis recurrence on norfloxacin secondary prophylaxis
    Shetty, Athish
    Raman, Rishi
    Pemmada, Vikas
    Musunuri, Balaji
    Shetty, Shiran
    Pai, C. Ganesh
    Bhat, Ganesh
    ARAB JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 25 (04) : 345 - 348