Cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implantation with humeral matchstick autograft augmentation: early radiographic outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Montemaggi, Paolo [1 ]
Lo, Eddie Y. [2 ,3 ]
Ouseph, Alvin [2 ,3 ]
Lund, Julia [2 ,3 ]
Krishnan, Sumant G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Cisanello Hosp, Pisa, Italy
[2] Baylor Scott & White Res Inst, Shoulder Ctr Res, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Shoulder Serv, Baylor Scott & White Hlth, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
Cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; humeral autograft; matchstick; stress shielding; fill ratio; proximal humeral bone loss; REVISION HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; BONE-RESORPTION; SHORT-STEM; PROSTHESIS; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.021
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Humeral-sided complications account for up to 21% of all revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) surgeries. Stress shielding with large bulky stems can lead to proximal bone resorption per Wolff law, complicating further surgeries. Previously published studies suggest that lowering the metaphyseal implant fill ratio can lead to fewer adaptive radiographic changes and decreased bone resorption. Inspired by these studies, cementless primary RTSA implantation technique with humeral matchstick autografts was proposed to augment cementless humeral constructs, foster the use of a smaller size stem, and create primary stability of the humeral implant even in osteoporotic or in-between size medullary canals. In this study, retrospective review of this cementless RTSA technique with short-term radiographic evaluation was performed. Methods: Forty-six nonconsecutive patients underwent primary RTSA with a short-stem cementless prosthesis (Stryker Ascend Flex) augmented by matchstick bone grafting from January to July 2020. Patient demographics were recorded, and follow-up radiographs were retrospectively reviewed to assess metaphyseal fill ratios and incidence of stress shielding at minimum 1-year follow-up. Discrepancies between templated and final stem sizes were recorded, along with all intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: Of the 46 patients originally identified, there were 5 men and 41 women with a mean age of 71 years (standard deviation [SD] 7, range 53-88). Mean templated stem size was 4 (SD 2, range 1-8), whereas the mean final implant size was 2 (SD 1, range 1-3). Mean fill ratios were 0.76 (SD 0.06, range 0.54-0.89) along the metaphysis and 0.67 (SD 0.09, range 0.49-0.83) along the diaphysis. There were no intraoperative humeral fractures from implantation. All patients were available for radiographic follow-up with a mean of 19 months (SD 8, range 12-40). There were 3 cases (7%) of proximal humeral stress shielding, with average fill ratios of 0.857 and 0.807 in the metaphysis and diaphysis, respectively. There were 3 patients (7%) who underwent revision surgeries for baseplate failure and periprosthetic humeral fracture. There were no cases of early humeral loosening. Discussion: Matchstick autograft humeral augmentation is a simple, promising surgical technique with low intraoperative complication rates and good short-term radiographic outcomes. When the implant fill ratio is successfully reduced, there is a possible lower risk of humeral stress shielding. The authors believe this technique can help maximize implant stability in cementless shoulder arthroplasty and preserve humeral bone stock for future revision surgeries. Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study (c) 2024 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:e422 / e428
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures
    Lo, Eddie Y.
    Rizkalla, James
    Montemaggi, Paolo
    Majekodunmi, Temilola
    Krishnan, Sumant G.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (08) : 1949 - 1956
  • [2] Outcomes following humeral head autograft glenoid reconstruction in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Guareschi, Alexander S.
    Gannon, Steven T.
    Welsh, Megan E.
    Reis, Robert J.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    King, Joseph J.
    Papandrea, Rick F.
    Simovitch, Ryan W.
    Friedman, Richard J.
    Eichinger, Josef K.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (04) : 1051 - 1060
  • [3] Cementless Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Technique to Maximize Press-Fit Fixation with Humeral Matchstick Bone Grafts
    Ouseph, Alvin
    Lo, Eddie Y.
    Montemaggi, Paolo
    Krishnan, Sumant G.
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [4] Cemented or cementless humeral fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Phadnis, J.
    Huang, T.
    Watts, A.
    Krishnan, J.
    Bain, G. I.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (01): : 65 - 74
  • [5] The incidence of radiographic aseptic loosening of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Gilot, Gregory
    Alvarez-Pinzon, Andres M.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    Flurin, Pierre-Henri
    Krill, Michael
    Routman, Howard D.
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1555 - 1559
  • [6] Humeral-sided Radiographic Changes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Broiln, Tyler J.
    Cox, Ryan M.
    Horneff, John G., III
    Namdari, Surena
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    Nicholson, Kristen
    Ramsey, Matthew L.
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2020, 8 (01): : 50 - 57
  • [7] Clinical outcomes and complications of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty during the early learning curve period
    Sungwook Choi
    Jong-Hwan Bae
    Yong Suk Kwon
    Hyunseong Kang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14
  • [8] Clinical outcomes and complications of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty during the early learning curve period
    Choi, Sungwook
    Bae, Jong-Hwan
    Kwon, Yong Suk
    Kang, Hyunseong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [9] Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of failed shoulder arthroplasty with proximal humeral bone loss: is allograft augmentation necessary?
    Budge, Matthew D.
    Moravek, James E.
    Zimel, Melissa N.
    Nolan, Elizabeth M.
    Wiater, J. Michael
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (06) : 739 - 744
  • [10] Humeral Stem Design in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Lehman, Andrew C.
    Su, Favian
    Feeley, Brian T.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2024, 17 (12) : 616 - 624